|
[Sponsors] |
March 30, 2020, 11:35 |
Mass flow inlet problem
|
#1 |
Member
Ahmed
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 34
Rep Power: 6 |
Hi guys
I am simulating charging a tank by heat pipe at bottom Geometry : when I did the geometry to separate the fluid in the tank from the fluid in the pipe I just made on sketch with rectangle >> surface from sketch >> another sketch have the pipe >> Face split to split sketch 2 from surface 1 Model setup: Bcs 1) walls of tank : I put expression for heat flux which represents the loss to the surroundin 2) Inlet to pipe : mass flow inlet with 0.05 kg/s 3) Outlet from pipe : outflow 4) top wall of pipe and its shadow : Coupled / copper 5) bottom wall of pipe and its shadow : Coupled / copper Problem is whenever I do the simulation the mass flow rate of both inlet and outlet drop to 0.026 so I don't know exactly where is the problem ??? |
|
March 31, 2020, 04:05 |
Clarity
|
#2 |
Senior Member
|
The description you have shared is not clear. Could you share a few images to clarify?
__________________
Regards, Vinerm PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority. |
|
March 31, 2020, 06:13 |
|
#3 |
Member
Ahmed
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 34
Rep Power: 6 |
dear Mr Vinerm,
Thanks for your help |
|
March 31, 2020, 06:15 |
|
#4 |
Member
Ahmed
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 34
Rep Power: 6 |
to be continued
|
|
March 31, 2020, 06:18 |
|
#5 |
Member
Ahmed
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 34
Rep Power: 6 |
here are the rest
|
|
March 31, 2020, 06:24 |
|
#6 |
Member
Ahmed
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 34
Rep Power: 6 |
The describtion:
Water at tank is initially at 20 degree C and Mass flow rate to the pipe is 0.05 kg/s and its temp is 60 degree c That is the all know So it is charging the tank from bottom so the tank will be mixed My problem 1) When the first iterations are preformed the mass flow rate become 0.026 instead of defined fixed rate of 0.05 2) The curve of outlet temp of the pipe is not smooth and this gives me nonj other smooth results but the paper I compare with has very smooth curves Please help |
|
March 31, 2020, 06:36 |
Boundary Conditions
|
#7 |
Senior Member
|
Two things need to be changed.
1. Change outlet condition from outflow to pressure outlet. 2. Use a time-step smaller than 1 s. 1 s is very large time-step for this simulation Furthermore, you are using Boussinesq for water density, however, you also need to ensure that the operating conditions, i.e., operating pressure, Boussinesq Temperature, Operating Density, and reference location for the operating pressure are correct.
__________________
Regards, Vinerm PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority. |
|
March 31, 2020, 06:58 |
|
#8 |
Member
Ahmed
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 34
Rep Power: 6 |
Thanks for reply
1) The outlet from the pipe is supposed to go through a cycle which is not mentioned in the paper and not mentioned its pressure so what should I do about that ? 2) so what does the large step probably cause ? unsmoothness of the curve or wrong results? 3) Where i can find those operating conditions in fluent , I never used them |
|
March 31, 2020, 09:14 |
Suggestions
|
#9 |
Senior Member
|
1. What is implied by a cycle? Is it a closed circuit for water? Then you need most likely not need to include it here because inlet would be based on what happens in the section where water is heated. So, most likely, this part is alright.
2. Time-step causes multiple changes. First, the simulation needs to be converged in each time-step. For a time-step of 1 s, this might require more than 30-40 iterations per time-step. This is akin to drawing a hexagon or octagon and calling it a circle. Numerical stability and physical accuracy, both are affected. 3. Operating conditions are available in the middle column when you double click on either Boundary Conditions or Cell Zone Conditions on the left column.
__________________
Regards, Vinerm PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mass flow inlet with given temperature | taalf | SU2 | 3 | October 15, 2015 14:25 |
Mass Flow Inlet | AZ1621 | FLUENT | 5 | July 6, 2015 19:54 |
Combination of mass flow inlet and pressure inlet boundaries | MrStuebb | Main CFD Forum | 0 | January 6, 2011 09:59 |
reversed flow at velocity inlet / mass flow inlet | ib | FLUENT | 1 | March 26, 2007 13:11 |
Mass flow inlet B.C. at exit... | Jack Keays | FLUENT | 2 | October 6, 2000 08:39 |