# Mesh Indepedence Test in Ahmed, Drag Coefficient still going down

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 December 6, 2017, 09:38 Mesh Indepedence Test in Ahmed, Drag Coefficient still going down #1 New Member   Join Date: Jul 2017 Posts: 7 Rep Power: 2 Welcome, I am trying to compute flow around Ahmed body in 2D and 3D in Fluent 18.1. I have done triangle mesh with inflation layer around body and refinement zone close to the body to capture all the vortices near wake and so on. Drag coefficient is the factor that I want to monitor to see if the solution is independent of the mesh For 2D case I've done several refinement of mesh and it went to level around Cd = 0.296 and flattened out so I considered this as proper mesh For 3D case for every refinement I'm making it seems like Cd is still going down for example: 0,292 for 3 400 000 elements mesh 0,290 for 4 100 000 elements mesh 0,286 for 5 500 000 elements mesh 0,28 for 7 300 000 elements mesh (I'm using symmetry plane in half of the Ahmed model to reduce mesh elements) During it I'm trying to refine both mesh in refinement zone and outside it respectively but I can't do it more because my PC is running out of RAM I assume I'm doing something wrong but I can't figure out what is it For Fluent settings I'm using -Steady state - Realizable k-epsilon turbulence model with Non-Equilibirum Wall Function -Inlet Velocity is 40m/s with 1% Turbulent Intensity and 10 Turbulent Viscosity Ratio -Pressure Outlet is 5% Turbulent Intensity and 10 Turbulent Viscosity Ratio - Solution Methods : Coupled, Least Squares Cell Based, Pressure Standard, First Order Upwind for Momentum, Turbulent Kinetic Energy and Dissipration Rate for around 50 first iterations then I'm changing it for Second Order Upwind - Controls : 50 Flow Courant Number and 0,25 for Momentum and Pressure - I'm initializing using values for k and epsilon from Velocity Inlet and 0 Velocity (according to http://www.southampton.ac.uk/~nwb/le...ice_Ver1_2.pdf page 13) - All other settings should be default If anyone knows how to do it properly or any kind of piece of advice I would be really grateful and sorry for this chaotic style of writing.

 Tags ahmed body, drag coefficient, grid independency, mesh independency

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post sam92 FLUENT 10 February 25, 2016 09:31 IvanST FLUENT 0 December 18, 2012 10:17 ozzythewise Main CFD Forum 8 June 13, 2012 06:24 aeroslacker Open Source Meshers: Gmsh, Netgen, CGNS, ... 12 January 19, 2012 04:52 ostervi FLUENT 0 June 12, 2009 12:59

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:32.