|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 390
Rep Power: 11 ![]() |
As you can see, the film flow downwards on the wall,the model is 4.6mm wide and 500mm long,I use fluent to simulate, the liquid inlet sets as the constant velocity, the wall and the gas inlet set as no slip wall whose contact angle is 45,the outlet and the side contrary to the wall set as pressure outlet with its gauge pressure is 0Pa. When I simulate it ,it always give a "reverse flow in the pressure outlet(include the two boundary who set as pressure outlet boundary) ".Do you think it is reasonable?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 390
Rep Power: 11 ![]() |
my boundary is big enough,the wide is 4.6mm,the length is 500mm,I think there is no need to enlarge the boundary.And I think there is no reverse flow ,do you agree with me ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Pressure outlet as a function of the flow rate (windkessel) | Trev0r | CFX | 10 | October 23, 2023 17:50 |
| Solution is converging but have reverse flow on pressure outlet | Dinesh_Dhande | Main CFD Forum | 2 | March 11, 2018 02:02 |
| Compressible flow, no data at the outlet | mireis | FLUENT | 6 | September 3, 2015 03:10 |
| sonicFoam - pressure driven pipe: flow continuity violation and waveTransmissive BC | Endel | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | September 11, 2014 17:29 |
| Terrible Mistake In Fluid Dynamics History | Abhi | Main CFD Forum | 12 | July 8, 2002 10:11 |