# Acoustic Power Discrepancy

 User Name Remember Me Password
 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 August 21, 2018, 09:46 Acoustic Power Discrepancy #1 Senior Member   Lee Strobel Join Date: Jun 2016 Posts: 133 Rep Power: 9 Hi, I am running a compressible simulation of internal flow through a valve and I am seeing quite a big discrepancy in the total integral of Acoustic Power, depending on whether I use the pressure-based or density-based solver. The simulation is 3D, compressible, steady with air. I am using the realizable k-epsilon turbulence model. I am doing a half-model, using a plane of symmetry down the center. The pressure drop is quite high (325 to 50 psi), so there are supersonic regions and shocks forming. I have kept the mesh, physical models, materials, b/cs the same for both cases. Literally the only difference is the solver. With the pressure-based solver (coupled, second-order momentum, turbulence, energy), I get the following result: Volume integral of acoustic power = 146.0 W Integral of surface acoustic power on walls = 140.6 W Mass integral of turbulent kinetic energy = 99.2 W With the density-based implicit solver, I get: Volume integral of acoustic power = 216.7 W Integral of surface acoustic power on walls = 125.5 W Mass integral of turbulent kinetic energy = 99.9 W The total acoustic power is almost 50% higher, although the total turbulent kinetic energy is almost the same. The overall mass flow and velocity field seem very similar between the two models. Does anyone know what might be causing this discrepancy between the broadband acoustic results of the two solvers?

 Tags acoustic, compressible air, discrepancy, solver

 Thread Tools Search this Thread Search this Thread: Advanced Search Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are Off Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Anupyemme Structural Mechanics 0 June 19, 2018 07:06 Hazem_9 ANSYS 1 May 11, 2017 14:22 Dano62 CFX 0 April 14, 2016 13:09 arunraj FLUENT 0 December 13, 2012 01:30 Frank Grassi FLUENT 0 October 12, 2007 11:20

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:19.

 Contact Us - CFD Online - Privacy Statement - Top