|
[Sponsors] |
September 5, 2018, 01:02 |
Bounded Second Order Transient Formulation
|
#1 |
New Member
alsawy
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 9 |
I'm simulating a rotating axial fan using sliding mesh. the domain has only one cell zone (which is a moving mesh).
for pressure inlet & outlet bounds, the transient formulation should it be Second order or BOUNDED second order? I've read here that bounded second order provides the same Accuracy for the second order with more stability. but in my case (moving mesh, compressible flow) will the bounded second order work fine? |
|
September 9, 2018, 11:58 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,668
Rep Power: 65 |
You should pretty much always use bounded second order. That's because regular second order is unbounded and produces non-physical oscillations (i.e. you can completely overshoot and undershoot). If your solution is stable enough then bounded/un-bounded would have produced similar results anyway.
Unless you have a specific need (i.e. you are benchmarking or validating against a specific objective), then always use bounded second order. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
First Order to Higher Order Blending Factor | NormalVector | FLUENT | 4 | November 13, 2023 07:06 |
Problems occur using kklomega in simpleFoam | PeterShi | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 26 | May 16, 2018 05:18 |
How grid resolution for a wave number depends on the scheme order? | marinkobezu | Main CFD Forum | 9 | September 21, 2017 12:11 |
IS calc. with 2nd order discret. always necessary? | Azman | FLUENT | 2 | March 14, 2013 04:28 |
Higher order formulation question | peterciaran | Main CFD Forum | 1 | July 27, 2012 13:47 |