CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

B.C. to simulate open space

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   October 16, 2018, 03:58
Default B.C. to simulate open space
  #1
Member
 
Mattia
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 45
Rep Power: 9
Comi is on a distinguished road
Hi, can any of you give me an advice regarding how to simulate open space with Fluent?

In my model I need to extract the surface temperatures of an heat exchanger in open space, the device is positioned at a certain distance from the floor and a wall. In order to reduce the number of elements I used simmetry on one side.
I placed the heat exchanger into a limited volume of air. If I assign the wall boundary condition to the walls that surround the air volume it would be like simulate the heat exchanger into a box, so is there a way to assign an open space-like B.C. to these walls?

Thanks very much
Comi is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 16, 2018, 11:51
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 152
Rep Power: 12
RaiderDoctor is on a distinguished road
Can you post a pic of your fluid domain with arrows pointing to your boundaries, and what conditions you assign them?
RaiderDoctor is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 16, 2018, 12:17
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,845
Rep Power: 68
LuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by Comi View Post
so is there a way to assign an open space-like B.C. to these walls?

A pressure inlet or a pressure outlet should work.
LuckyTran is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 17, 2018, 04:59
Default
  #4
Member
 
Mattia
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 45
Rep Power: 9
Comi is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuckyTran View Post
A pressure inlet or a pressure outlet should work.
Thanks, I will try that
Comi is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 17, 2018, 07:20
Default
  #5
Member
 
Mattia
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 45
Rep Power: 9
Comi is on a distinguished road
I have another question: in order to use pressure inlet or pressure outlet I should set the Gauge Pressure to zero right? The operating pressure is still at default value
Comi is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 17, 2018, 10:33
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,845
Rep Power: 68
LuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by Comi View Post
I have another question: in order to use pressure inlet or pressure outlet I should set the Gauge Pressure to zero right? The operating pressure is still at default value

Right... If you keep the default operating pressure (which is ~1 atm) and set a zero gauge pressure, then your boundary condition is ~1atm of absolute static pressure.
LuckyTran is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 5, 2018, 07:17
Default
  #7
Member
 
Mattia
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 45
Rep Power: 9
Comi is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by RaiderDoctor View Post
Can you post a pic of your fluid domain with arrows pointing to your boundaries, and what conditions you assign them?
Regarding your request here is a pick of the geometry, due to some circumstances I can't show you the details.

I have a radiator that hang on a wall, the radiator has n eletric resistance inside and i want to know what will be the surface temperature at steady state.

That is why I needed the open space like BC. Unfortunately using the pressure inlet or pressure outlet I can't reach a satisfying solution, probably i'm missing something again.

I'm using pressure based solver, the resistance is a parallelepiped that is not included into the domain, I just gave the W/m2 distribution at the surfaces that represent the resistence. The resistence is in contact both with the raditator and the air.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Cattura.JPG (84.2 KB, 12 views)
Comi is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 7, 2018, 06:09
Default
  #8
Member
 
Mattia
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 45
Rep Power: 9
Comi is on a distinguished road
Another question: even though I impose a certain energy flux on the surfaces of the resistance the fluid fluxes are all wrong. Instead of having hot air going versus the top of the volume , air just enter from the top side of the pressure inlet and exit from the bottom. I tried to cheat by puttting a pressure outlet on the top of the volume but the direction of the flux doesn't change.
Any suggestion?
I'm using k-epsilon turbulence model, s2s, pressure based solver

Thank you
Comi is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
wmake compiling new solver mksca OpenFOAM Programming & Development 14 June 22, 2018 07:29
[swak4Foam] swak4foam building problem GGerber OpenFOAM Community Contributions 54 April 24, 2015 17:02
[swak4Foam] Error bulding swak4Foam sfigato OpenFOAM Community Contributions 18 August 22, 2013 13:41
[swak4Foam] funkySetFields compilation error tayo OpenFOAM Community Contributions 39 December 3, 2012 06:18
openfoam 1.6 on debian etch romant OpenFOAM Installation 9 May 6, 2010 03:26


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:36.