 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
[Sponsors] | ||||
Does a larger number of iterations for steady state gives better result? |
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
March 3, 2019, 00:09
|
Does a larger number of iterations for steady state gives better result?
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 65
Rep Power: 7  |
Hi i am new to CFD so forgive me if this is a dumb question. I am working on supersonic impinge flow using steady-state and I managed to captured the shock wave as described by the paper. However that is provided that my no. of iterations is not too large. If my no. of iterations is too large, the result will show some weird result, usually no flow is shown. If I reduced that iterations, i will get a good result. I thought that if I increase the iterations, the result will be better as the solution got more iterations to stabilize.
When I increase my velocity at inlet, the no. of available iterations that I can use decrease too. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Decomposing meshes | Tobi | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 22 | February 24, 2023 09:23 |
| Maximum number of iterations exceeded chtmultiregionsimpleFoam | Moncef | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 28 | July 13, 2020 14:26 |
| [snappyHexMesh] Error snappyhexmesh - Multiple outside loops | avinashjagdale | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 53 | March 8, 2019 09:42 |
| simpleFoam error - "Floating point exception" | mbcx4jc2 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 12 | August 4, 2015 02:20 |
| Cannot run the code properly: very large time step continuity error | crst15 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 9 | December 14, 2014 18:17 |
Linear Mode
