|
[Sponsors] |
March 18, 2019, 01:17 |
Proper Mesh for NACA 0012 Validation
|
#1 |
New Member
Anthony Tang
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 7 |
Hi guys,
I'm trying to validate a NACA 0012 for a research project but I cannot seem to get the small wall layer height for an appropriate y+ value. I followed this guide https://confluence.cornell.edu/displ...Airfoil+-+Mesh and it creates a good enough mesh for invisid flow but not Spallart-Allmarus turbulent. I know the first height cannot be above a y + value of 1 so for my chord length 1 airfoil I need a first height of around .2mm but I cannot seem to get that height below 2mm. Since I'm using a face meshing I cannot use an inflation and can't seem to get the first layer height smaller. Does anyone know how to make the first height layer smaller / create an inflation in addition to using the face mesh? CFD online has example mesh with the inflation-like layer but I don't know how it got that. The example can be found here: https://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/NACA0012_airfoil Images of the mesh as of now with parameters : https://imgur.com/a/SF5uHzn |
|
Tags |
ansys, fluent, mesh, naca 0012, workbench ansys 18 |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
y+ = 1 boundary layer mesh with snappyHexMesh | Arzed23 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 6 | November 23, 2022 15:15 |
[snappyHexMesh] No layers in a small gap | bobburnquist | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 6 | August 26, 2015 09:38 |
Mesh motion with Translation & Rotation | Doginal | CFX | 2 | January 12, 2014 06:21 |
[snappyHexMesh] snappyHexMesh won't work - zeros everywhere! | sc298 | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | March 27, 2011 21:11 |
fluent add additional zones for the mesh file | SSL | FLUENT | 2 | January 26, 2008 11:55 |