CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Periodic Flow with k-epsilon with wall enhanced

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   April 21, 2019, 13:53
Default Periodic Flow with k-epsilon with wall enhanced
  #1
New Member
 
iigo
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
iigo is on a distinguished road
Hello CFD users,

I´m having trouble trying to simulate the following problem. In a 20 mm diameter pipe and 100 mm of length flows water, with a mass flow rate of 0.3 kg/s. The results without ANSYS would be of a v=0,95684, Re=21434, lambda = 0,025, pressure drop (Darcy-Weisbach) = 58,1317 Pa.
I have introduced the problem to Fluent with the k-epsilon Enhanced Wall Treatment option (I´m very interested in the solution of the laminar layer in the turbulent flow), and I wanted to make the conditions translationally periodic.
I have made the velocity inlet the periodic zone and the pressure outlet the shadow zone, and I have inserted in the periodic conditions a mass flow rate of 0.3 kg/s and pressure gradient of 581,317 Pa.
When I simulate it, however, the error in continuity rapidly rises. I am doing something wrong in Fluent, but I don´t know why ¿what can it be? (I have just started learning this program one month ago).

Kind regards
Attached Images
File Type: png Error1.png (11.0 KB, 4 views)
File Type: jpg Error2.jpg (99.1 KB, 7 views)
iigo is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 22, 2019, 14:40
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,672
Rep Power: 65
LuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura about
You only have 50 iterations. Keep cranking. The turbulent viscosity warning also needs to go away. At this point, the quality of your initial guess is still strongly impacting the current solution.

Btw, if you use the mass-flow rate option, you can't specify also the pressure gradient. Putting in a number there doesn't do anything. The gradient is a result calculated from the solution.
LuckyTran is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 23, 2019, 11:11
Default
  #3
New Member
 
iigo
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
iigo is on a distinguished road
Thanks for replying! I have tried to iterate more (until 1200), and I have obtained the results in the picture that I attach. The continuity one is not converging. By the way, LuckyTran, when you say that the turbulent alert needs to go away, does it mean that there is a manual way to deactivate it?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Error3.jpg (99.4 KB, 3 views)
iigo is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Laminar flow and wall roughness junbbung FLUENT 2 November 26, 2022 21:22
decomposePar problem: Cell 0contains face labels out of range vaina74 OpenFOAM Pre-Processing 37 July 20, 2020 05:38
My radial inflow turbine Abo Anas CFX 27 May 11, 2018 01:44
Centrifugal fan-reverse flow in outlet lesds to a mass in flow field xiexing CFX 3 March 29, 2017 10:00
wall roughness in enhanced wall treatment lobstar FLUENT 7 June 29, 2012 04:43


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:45.