CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Classification and Selection of Solvers for low subsonic flows in CFD

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   July 24, 2019, 05:04
Smile Classification and Selection of Solvers for low subsonic flows in CFD
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
udaych17 is on a distinguished road
I am working on an external compressible aerodynamics flow problem which deals with speeds of Mach 0.45. I am uncertain whether to choose a density-based solver or a pressure-based solver. Generally accepted range from incompressible flows is below Mach 0.3 and Pressure-based solvers are considered best for incompressible flows but at speeds of Mach 0.45 will it be a good choice to still opt for Pressure-based Solver? My understanding is that density-based solvers take more time and memory for solving the problem and hence I want to weigh my decision based on any useful feedback or suggestions.
Thanks in advance!
udaych17 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 24, 2019, 10:39
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,069
Rep Power: 60
LuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura about
Both will work (and work very well). You can use whichever one you like.

There are no incompressible flows per se in Fluent.... it's solving the full compressible navier-stokes regardless of whether you use the pressure-based or density-based solver.

Pressure-based solvers are good for low mach number flows because density-based ones are (traditionally) unstable there without special treatment. Modern solvers have this treatment to stabilize the solver and you can use the density-based solvers for low Mach flows now too.

Pressure-based solvers also can be used for high Mach number flows (I have used it up to Mach 25). They can be less than optimal compared to density based solvers because the momentum-energy coupling is much more important in compressible flows and pressure-based solvers are (they are not bad per se but they are) not as good as density-based solvers at maintaining this coupling.

Density-based solvers do take more time and memory per iteration to solve. However, for compressible flows where coupling between different equations is limiting convergence, they tend to converge in fewer iterations than pressure-based solvers (and can be cheaper overall).
LuckyTran is offline   Reply With Quote


ansys fluent 19.2, compressible flow, density based solver, incompressible flow, pressure based solver

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 23:09.