|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
New Member
Tim
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 10 ![]() |
I've seen a few papers talk about how ‘Incident Radiation’ or ‘Surface Incident
Radiation’ that is available as a field variable from Fluent is not the measurement one would want to use to obtain how much radiaiton a flame is giving off. For example, if I wanted to make a virtual radiometer in Fluent, what variable should I check over a small area to see what the incoming radiaiton is from a large fire? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Svetlana Tkachenko
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Australia, Sydney
Posts: 423
Rep Power: 15 ![]() |
Which papers?
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
New Member
Tim
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 10 ![]() |
http://cdmbuntu.lib.utah.edu/utils/g...ename/2387.pdf
"One should note that the ‘Incident Radiation’ or ‘Surface Incident Radiation’ that is available as a field variable from the CFD software is not the radiation intensity that is of interest. Manipulation of the field variables is required to obtain the proper value for post-processing." |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
New Member
Tim
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 10 ![]() |
I am trying to compare my CFD data for a large flare simulation with experiment. This includes calculating the radation to several remote targets (radiometers) around the fire at various distances. What variable should I monitor or compute to determine the radiation from the fire to the targets?
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,797
Rep Power: 66 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
If you are using a virtual radiometer, then surface incident radiation is the variable you want because you are not measuring how much radiation the flame is producing, but how much radiation arrives at your meter.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
New Member
Tim
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 10 ![]() |
Is there a tool to create "virtual radiometers"? Right now I'm just creating small square plane surfaces within my domain and preforming surface integrals etc. Can I not compare the incident radiation values before and after the flame is present?
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Senior Member
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,797
Rep Power: 66 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
It's fine to compare incident values before and after the flame, because that's what you would do with a radiometer anyway. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
fire, flare, fluent, radiation |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Difficulties with premixed laminar methane flame in openFoam | DustExplosion | OpenFOAM | 16 | August 9, 2019 05:31 |
Flame kernal and flame propogation | daizy | EnSight | 5 | May 17, 2017 10:15 |
Initializing the flame for 1D premixed flame test case | R.Mah | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | January 11, 2017 08:44 |
calculate flame speed using reactingFoam | IColin | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | February 4, 2014 15:14 |
premixed flame modeling problem | peiyong wang | CFX | 1 | July 18, 2008 12:02 |