|
[Sponsors] |
Modeling of solid getting heated due to hot air. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
May 27, 2020, 09:32 |
Modeling of solid getting heated due to hot air.
|
#1 |
New Member
Shubh
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 5 |
Model: I have made 3D geometry of small copper block and made computational domain around it. I want to heat this copper block to nearly about 1000°C by passing hot air from inlet at 1000°C.
I don't know what radiation model can I use here since I was trying simulation with DO model. But block is getting heated by only 1°C. But actually it should be achieving temperature nearly about 1000°C. Please help me setup the right model for this problem. |
|
May 27, 2020, 09:40 |
Heating Mechanism
|
#2 |
Senior Member
|
Do you want heat to be transferred by radiation or convection or conduction or a combination of these? Furthermore, DO makes sense only if air is wet and/or it has some greenhouse gas or soot particles.
__________________
Regards, Vinerm PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority. |
|
May 27, 2020, 10:33 |
|
#3 | |
New Member
Shubh
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 5 |
Quote:
I guess I am simulating this problem in wrong way, air is dry. Can you please throw some light on how to do modeling of this problem? |
||
May 27, 2020, 11:36 |
Dry Air
|
#4 |
Senior Member
|
Dry air will not have much of radiation effect since the emissivity is more or less 0. So, it would primarily be convection and conduction.
__________________
Regards, Vinerm PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority. |
|
May 27, 2020, 12:23 |
|
#5 | |
New Member
Shubh
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 5 |
Quote:
Hence now I am not sure which way to set up the model. Can you suggest something from your side? |
||
May 27, 2020, 12:27 |
First Step
|
#6 |
Senior Member
|
As a first step, do not solve any flow or turbulence. Just initialize the air with high temperature and solid block with low temperature. Run it as steady-state. Solve only Energy equation; keep other equations disabled. Look at the results. If it shows that solid is colder than air, then there is problem with interaction between fluid and solid domain.
__________________
Regards, Vinerm PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority. |
|
May 27, 2020, 15:01 |
|
#7 | |
New Member
Shubh
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 5 |
Quote:
|
||
May 27, 2020, 15:12 |
Cht
|
#8 |
Senior Member
|
That means the fluid-solid interaction is good.
Now, try with fluid flow but use a very high thermal conductivity and very low specific heat for fluid as well as solid; increase (and decrease) the values artificially by a factor of 1000 or so. This is just to test the time required to heat it up. Once you find the time required for the solid to heat up with modified properties, then reduce change the thermal conductivity and specific heat back to normal. The time found using such method would not be accurate but will give you an idea about a scale. In practice, diffusion time-scale is given by ratio of square of length scale and diffusion coefficient. For fluid, length scale is usually the thickness of thermal boundary layer and diffusion coefficient is thermal diffusion coefficient. This directly gives you time scale for thermal diffusion. Do note, however, that turbulence increases the diffusion coefficient almost 500 to 1000 times depending upon the turbulence structure, hence, reduces the time-scale by a large factor.
__________________
Regards, Vinerm PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority. |
|
June 2, 2020, 05:25 |
|
#9 | |
New Member
Shubh
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 5 |
Quote:
|
||
June 2, 2020, 05:27 |
Radiation
|
#10 |
Senior Member
|
Since the gas is dry air, use Surface-to-Surface model
__________________
Regards, Vinerm PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority. |
|
June 2, 2020, 13:21 |
|
#11 |
New Member
Shubh
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 5 |
Thanks. Since optical thickness of air is zero I was also thinking of this model after you suggested it earlier.
Suppose my inlet surface is not directly facing the copper block, then also S2S can be used? That is if heated air is coming from inlets such as burners which doesn't directly face the copper block. Last edited by ShubhCFD; June 2, 2020 at 14:55. |
|
June 2, 2020, 15:34 |
View Factors
|
#12 |
Senior Member
|
In S2S, everything is based on the geometry, i.e., the view factors. So, even if some boundary is not facing some other boundary directly, it would have its effects via reflections or at rather acute angles with low view factors.
__________________
Regards, Vinerm PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority. |
|
Tags |
ansys fluent, heat transfer |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Custom Thermophysical Properties | wsmith02 | OpenFOAM | 4 | June 1, 2023 14:30 |
[swak4Foam] funkyDoCalc with OF2.3 massflow | NiFl | OpenFOAM Community Contributions | 14 | November 25, 2020 03:30 |
moving a cold solid body into stationary hot air for heat transfer | shyamgarg | Main CFD Forum | 3 | December 26, 2019 22:41 |
[OpenFOAM.org] Error creating ParaView-4.1.0 OpenFOAM 2.3.0 | tlcoons | OpenFOAM Installation | 13 | April 20, 2016 17:34 |
moving solid plate which a hot air jet from a stationary nozzle | mehdikamrani | CFX | 3 | March 7, 2013 03:46 |