CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Modeling of solid getting heated due to hot air.

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree8Likes
  • 2 Post By vinerm
  • 1 Post By vinerm
  • 2 Post By vinerm
  • 1 Post By vinerm
  • 2 Post By vinerm

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   May 27, 2020, 09:32
Default Modeling of solid getting heated due to hot air.
  #1
New Member
 
Shubh
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 5
ShubhCFD is on a distinguished road
Model: I have made 3D geometry of small copper block and made computational domain around it. I want to heat this copper block to nearly about 1000°C by passing hot air from inlet at 1000°C.
I don't know what radiation model can I use here since I was trying simulation with DO model. But block is getting heated by only 1°C. But actually it should be achieving temperature nearly about 1000°C.
Please help me setup the right model for this problem.
ShubhCFD is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 27, 2020, 09:40
Default Heating Mechanism
  #2
Senior Member
 
vinerm's Avatar
 
Vinerm
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Nederland
Posts: 2,946
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 35
vinerm will become famous soon enough
Do you want heat to be transferred by radiation or convection or conduction or a combination of these? Furthermore, DO makes sense only if air is wet and/or it has some greenhouse gas or soot particles.
ShubhCFD and Phanindra Raavi like this.
__________________
Regards,
Vinerm

PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority.
vinerm is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 27, 2020, 10:33
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Shubh
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 5
ShubhCFD is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by vinerm View Post
Do you want heat to be transferred by radiation or convection or conduction or a combination of these? Furthermore, DO makes sense only if air is wet and/or it has some greenhouse gas or soot particles.
I want the combination of all modes of heat transfer.
I guess I am simulating this problem in wrong way, air is dry. Can you please throw some light on how to do modeling of this problem?
ShubhCFD is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 27, 2020, 11:36
Default Dry Air
  #4
Senior Member
 
vinerm's Avatar
 
Vinerm
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Nederland
Posts: 2,946
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 35
vinerm will become famous soon enough
Dry air will not have much of radiation effect since the emissivity is more or less 0. So, it would primarily be convection and conduction.
__________________
Regards,
Vinerm

PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority.
vinerm is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 27, 2020, 12:23
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Shubh
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 5
ShubhCFD is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by vinerm View Post
Dry air will not have much of radiation effect since the emissivity is more or less 0. So, it would primarily be convection and conduction.
At first I was using only convective modeling and by using K-epsilon model without radiation modeling there was not much increase in the temperature of copper block.
Hence now I am not sure which way to set up the model. Can you suggest something from your side?
ShubhCFD is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 27, 2020, 12:27
Default First Step
  #6
Senior Member
 
vinerm's Avatar
 
Vinerm
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Nederland
Posts: 2,946
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 35
vinerm will become famous soon enough
As a first step, do not solve any flow or turbulence. Just initialize the air with high temperature and solid block with low temperature. Run it as steady-state. Solve only Energy equation; keep other equations disabled. Look at the results. If it shows that solid is colder than air, then there is problem with interaction between fluid and solid domain.
ShubhCFD likes this.
__________________
Regards,
Vinerm

PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority.
vinerm is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 27, 2020, 15:01
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Shubh
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 5
ShubhCFD is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by vinerm View Post
As a first step, do not solve any flow or turbulence. Just initialize the air with high temperature and solid block with low temperature. Run it as steady-state. Solve only Energy equation; keep other equations disabled. Look at the results. If it shows that solid is colder than air, then there is problem with interaction between fluid and solid domain.
Hello, I tried the simulation and the copper block has reached the inlet temperature in steady state simulation. Thanks, I feel more confident now. But I don't know why it is not working in transient simulation. I want to know the time it requires to reach that state and the temperature changes in the block. Further help from you will be greatly appreciated.
ShubhCFD is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 27, 2020, 15:12
Default Cht
  #8
Senior Member
 
vinerm's Avatar
 
Vinerm
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Nederland
Posts: 2,946
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 35
vinerm will become famous soon enough
That means the fluid-solid interaction is good.

Now, try with fluid flow but use a very high thermal conductivity and very low specific heat for fluid as well as solid; increase (and decrease) the values artificially by a factor of 1000 or so. This is just to test the time required to heat it up. Once you find the time required for the solid to heat up with modified properties, then reduce change the thermal conductivity and specific heat back to normal. The time found using such method would not be accurate but will give you an idea about a scale.

In practice, diffusion time-scale is given by ratio of square of length scale and diffusion coefficient. For fluid, length scale is usually the thickness of thermal boundary layer and diffusion coefficient is thermal diffusion coefficient. This directly gives you time scale for thermal diffusion. Do note, however, that turbulence increases the diffusion coefficient almost 500 to 1000 times depending upon the turbulence structure, hence, reduces the time-scale by a large factor.
ShubhCFD and Phanindra Raavi like this.
__________________
Regards,
Vinerm

PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority.
vinerm is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 2, 2020, 05:25
Default
  #9
New Member
 
Shubh
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 5
ShubhCFD is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by vinerm View Post
That means the fluid-solid interaction is good.

Now, try with fluid flow but use a very high thermal conductivity and very low specific heat for fluid as well as solid; increase (and decrease) the values artificially by a factor of 1000 or so. This is just to test the time required to heat it up. Once you find the time required for the solid to heat up with modified properties, then reduce change the thermal conductivity and specific heat back to normal. The time found using such method would not be accurate but will give you an idea about a scale.

In practice, diffusion time-scale is given by ratio of square of length scale and diffusion coefficient. For fluid, length scale is usually the thickness of thermal boundary layer and diffusion coefficient is thermal diffusion coefficient. This directly gives you time scale for thermal diffusion. Do note, however, that turbulence increases the diffusion coefficient almost 500 to 1000 times depending upon the turbulence structure, hence, reduces the time-scale by a large factor.
Thank you so much. I tried with your instructions and got the results. But I think radiation effects could also be included in the modelling as the block is heating very slowly, since surrounding is at 1000°C and block is at 25°C. So which radiation model could be suitable in this case?
ShubhCFD is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 2, 2020, 05:27
Default Radiation
  #10
Senior Member
 
vinerm's Avatar
 
Vinerm
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Nederland
Posts: 2,946
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 35
vinerm will become famous soon enough
Since the gas is dry air, use Surface-to-Surface model
ShubhCFD likes this.
__________________
Regards,
Vinerm

PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority.
vinerm is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 2, 2020, 13:21
Default
  #11
New Member
 
Shubh
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 5
ShubhCFD is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by vinerm View Post
Since the gas is dry air, use Surface-to-Surface model
Thanks. Since optical thickness of air is zero I was also thinking of this model after you suggested it earlier.
Suppose my inlet surface is not directly facing the copper block, then also S2S can be used? That is if heated air is coming from inlets such as burners which doesn't directly face the copper block.

Last edited by ShubhCFD; June 2, 2020 at 14:55.
ShubhCFD is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 2, 2020, 15:34
Default View Factors
  #12
Senior Member
 
vinerm's Avatar
 
Vinerm
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Nederland
Posts: 2,946
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 35
vinerm will become famous soon enough
In S2S, everything is based on the geometry, i.e., the view factors. So, even if some boundary is not facing some other boundary directly, it would have its effects via reflections or at rather acute angles with low view factors.
ShubhCFD and Phanindra Raavi like this.
__________________
Regards,
Vinerm

PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority.
vinerm is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
ansys fluent, heat transfer


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Custom Thermophysical Properties wsmith02 OpenFOAM 4 June 1, 2023 14:30
[swak4Foam] funkyDoCalc with OF2.3 massflow NiFl OpenFOAM Community Contributions 14 November 25, 2020 03:30
moving a cold solid body into stationary hot air for heat transfer shyamgarg Main CFD Forum 3 December 26, 2019 22:41
[OpenFOAM.org] Error creating ParaView-4.1.0 OpenFOAM 2.3.0 tlcoons OpenFOAM Installation 13 April 20, 2016 17:34
moving solid plate which a hot air jet from a stationary nozzle mehdikamrani CFX 3 March 7, 2013 03:46


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:12.