CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Condensation - Inverted Phases Give Different Results

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   March 20, 2021, 11:01
Default Condensation - Inverted Phases Give Different Results
New Member
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
Luuuca94 is on a distinguished road
Hello everyone,

I am doing VOF-Simulations in Ansys Fluent and I am interested in modeling condensation phase change with the Lee model (Evaporation-Condensation Model).
I am simulating condensation of water vapor on a flat surface. For this, I have defined a computational domain that is composed of a copper base-plate with a cubic fluid domain on top (see attached images). The top-surface of the cubic domain is defined as a pressure inlet while the lateral surfaces are defined as periodic walls. The complete settings are the following:

• Gravity perpendicular to surface where droplet sits
• Models: VOF (implicit body force ON), Energy ON, Laminar flow
• chosing water vapor and water liquid from fluent database (with given standard state enthalpies) and setting water as primary phase and vapor as secondary phase.
• Mass transfer mechanisms: evaporation- condensation frequency of 100'000.
• Surface tension: Wall and Jump adhesion, coeff. = 0.072 N/m (between liquid and vapor)
• Chosing copper as plate material, contact angle = 120°, 350x350x350 micrometers computational domain with the copper surface as bottom surface.
• Boundary conditions:
○ plate temperature 323.15K
○ interior fluid temp: 373.15 K
○ top-surface: pressure inlet (gauge pressure 0 bar, 373.15K inlet temp, volume fraction liquid = 0)
○ wall1-3 periodic boundary
○ wall2-4 periodic boundary
○ Operating conditions: set operating pressure at top-surface, specified operation density: 0.5542 kg/m3
• Solution methods: SIMPLE, Second Order Upwind for Energy and Momentum, Geo-reconstruct for volume fraction, default for rest.
• Convergence criteria: 10-3 for continuity, momentum and volume of fraction equation, 10-6 for energy equation
• Initialization: standard

The issue I am facing is that with this setup, the amount of water condensed on the surface is not compatible with the Wall Heat Flux measured at the bottom surface. In other words, with the wall heat flux that is measured at the bottom copper plate, the amount of water condensed should have been substantially less, considering also the difference in standard state enthalpies between water liquid and water vapor. With this setup, I get about 10-20 times the amount of water condensed that is expected when taking in account the wall heat flux at the bottom plate.
Now, If I invert the phases (vapor as primary phase and water as secondary phase) and let the rest of the setup identical, the amount of water condensed is much less and is compatible with the wall heat flux measured at the bottom copper plate. This means that the Heat Transfer Coefficient calculated by taking in account the wall heat flux is about the same as the heat transfer coefficient calculated by taking in account the amount of water condensed in the given flow time.

If anyone has a clue why inverted phases cause such a difference in the amount of condensed water it would be of great help.

I thank you in advance and best regards.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg water_p.jpg (19.9 KB, 0 views)
File Type: jpg vapor_p.jpg (20.9 KB, 0 views)
Luuuca94 is offline   Reply With Quote


condensation, lee model, phases, vof

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
rasInterFoam appears to give erroneous results for “pd”. richard_kenny OpenFOAM Bugs 6 August 2, 2013 17:12
[swak4Foam] OpenFOAM 1.6 and 1.7 with interFoam, groovyBC give different strange results Arnoldinho OpenFOAM Community Contributions 7 December 9, 2010 16:29
Exporting Fluent results as 4D images in an interactive window Luca95314 ANSYS 0 October 11, 2010 17:16
why dynamic mesh method give wrong results? weiyang1980 Main CFD Forum 0 September 22, 2009 21:06
Must periodic oscillation give periodic results? zonexo Main CFD Forum 6 May 13, 2007 15:36

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:03.