CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

transient VOF simulation with discontinuity at interface

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   June 21, 2021, 20:37
Default transient VOF simulation with discontinuity at interface
  #1
Member
 
Tyler Richardson
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 30
Rep Power: 7
tricha122 is on a distinguished road
Hi,

I have been solving a crank lubrication problem with a static inlet, and rotating crank (mesh motion). I have done this steady state (frame rotation) and transient (mesh motion) with success.

I have been looking into the effects of air entrapment with a VOF model (0.1 volu fract at the inlet). And now i am having issues with convergence. The model typically starts fine, and then after a few hundred time steps will start diverging either due to turb / molecular viscosity limit, or courant number exceeding 250.

I am using a pressure inlet and pressure outlet boundary condition, and recently started ramping up the pressure linearly with time, and ramping up the speed linearly with time (offset from the pressure, so that speed doesn't start ramping until pressure is fully on) to try and overcome these convergence problems.

I look back into my recently stored databases, and find that there is a big pressure gradient across my interface. I post process the flow through the interface and it seems to line up properly, but nonetheless there is a big step change in pressure across the interface. Since i've been using the VOF model i've played a lot with the p-v coupling, under-relaxation, etc and so i am not sure if it is common for there to be discrepancies across the interface, or if my under-relaxation between pressure and momentum are out of whack or something.

Has anyone had any experience like this? Ultimately i do not make it to full pressure before the solution diverges (and so mesh motion is ON, but rotating at 0.0001 rad/s, it never begins ramping). When I solve this model steady state (in absence of the VOF) my y+ / y* are <5 everywhere in the model.

and FYI when i solve this model steady state / transient (without VOF) there is no pressure discontinuity across the interface.

Any guidance would be greatly appreciated!

VOF setup:

/define/models/viscous/ke-rng? yes
/define/models/viscous/near-wall-treatment/enhanced-wall-treatment yes
/define/models/multiphase/model vof number-of-phases 2 body-force-formulation yes volume-fraction-parameters explicit 0.25 1E-6

relaxation / discretization:

/solve/set/p-v-coupling 22
/solve/set/discretization-scheme mom 0
/solve/set/discretization-scheme epsilon 0
/solve/set/discretization-scheme k 0
/solve/set/discretization-scheme pressure 13
/solve/set/discretization-scheme mp 16
/solve/set/under-relaxation pressure 0.6
/solve/set/under-relaxation mp 0.5
/solve/set/under-relaxation turb-viscosity 0.5
/solve/set/under-relaxation epsilon 0.5
/solve/set/under-relaxation mom 0.75
tricha122 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
interface, moving mesh, rotating cylinder, vof

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Species transfer in the interface of a phase change VOF simulation Asghari_M Main CFD Forum 0 May 26, 2018 05:45
How to use the CFX periodic interface zhihuawan CFX 61 January 15, 2018 17:20
VoF, Width of interface between immiscible fluids, how to define sharp interface? yulu FLUENT 2 December 19, 2017 04:41
Question about adaptive timestepping Guille1811 CFX 25 November 12, 2017 18:38
Problem in initializing transient simulation with a finer mesh sidd CFX 8 April 29, 2016 03:25


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:14.