CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Simulating a rotary blade: Geometry Subtraction in sliding mesh vs moving frame

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By LuckyTran

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   December 30, 2021, 07:58
Default Simulating a rotary blade: Geometry Subtraction in sliding mesh vs moving frame
  #1
New Member
 
Sardar
Join Date: Dec 2021
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 2
SardarMech is on a distinguished road
(Chances are this is a question more fitting the geometry and meshing forum, but I decided otherwise.)

I am somehow new to the fluent. and am trying to simulate a rotary impeller in a mixing tank. I have two zones: "tank_body" and the "rotary_zone".

I can see online that two methods are available: first "moving/soliding mesh" and, second "moving frame."

Q1. Online videos suggest that when sliding mesh is chosen, the rotor volume should be subtracted from the surrounding rotary zone. But what about the moving frame method? It looks like if the frame method is chosen,the blades' volume is NOT subtracted from the "rotary zone", apparantly because the blades are going to be given a zero rotational velocity with respect to the moving frame surrounding the blades.

Q2. Can I NOT subtract the blade volumes from the rotary zone, and at the same time use the moving mesh method?

Thanks. Any help is very much appreciated as I am single-handed and working for a tight deadline.
SardarMech is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 31, 2021, 09:33
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,023
Rep Power: 60
LuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura about
If we're talking about the same tank with an impeller in it and nothing else, the geometry and mesh for both methods are the same. Only when you try to model systems of parts do things become different, because then you have regions of moving things and regions of not-moving things to worry about.


You always have to subtract the impeller. You are doing CFD, having a mesh of the solid doesn't get you anywhere.
SardarMech likes this.
LuckyTran is online now   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
frame motion, rotor blade, sliding mesh method

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Moving reference frame for turbine simulation Rahl141 STAR-CCM+ 2 December 28, 2017 06:25
[snappyHexMesh] No layers in a small gap bobburnquist OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 6 August 26, 2015 09:38
Prob with sliding mesh for moving trains Sid Main CFD Forum 4 February 5, 2012 23:21
Blade pitching, butterfly valves, moving mesh Andy Fiedler CFX 6 May 28, 2010 08:55
fluent add additional zones for the mesh file SSL FLUENT 2 January 26, 2008 11:55


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:01.