CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Unexpected interface between domains

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree12Likes
  • 1 Post By nina1234
  • 2 Post By AlexanderZ
  • 1 Post By nina1234
  • 1 Post By nina1234
  • 2 Post By AlexanderZ
  • 1 Post By nina1234
  • 2 Post By AlexanderZ
  • 1 Post By AlexanderZ
  • 1 Post By AlexanderZ

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   June 22, 2022, 17:31
Default Unexpected interface between domains
  #1
New Member
 
nina
Join Date: Jun 2022
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 3
nina1234 is on a distinguished road
Hello,

I am trying to model a rotating propeller. I watched several youtube tutorials. The idea is to create a static domain (box), and a rotating domain (cylinder) inside, which contains the propeller.
I created booleans in order to separate the cylinder from the box and the propeller from the cylinder.
I checked my mesh and everything looks fine.
I checked that Ansys created interfaces between both domains (rotating and static) but when I look at the results it behaves as if the cylinder would be a solid...

If someone knows how to make my cylinder "transparent" so that the air flow could interact with the propeller directly, thank you!
Attached Images
File Type: png Capture.PNG (130.1 KB, 24 views)
File Type: jpg contact_region.jpg (124.0 KB, 20 views)
File Type: jpg geometry.jpg (70.5 KB, 20 views)
File Type: jpg mesh.jpg (174.0 KB, 21 views)
File Type: jpg setup.jpg (108.4 KB, 18 views)
zeldaa likes this.
nina1234 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 22, 2022, 22:54
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Alexander
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,363
Rep Power: 34
AlexanderZ will become famous soon enoughAlexanderZ will become famous soon enough
picture 3

the issue is: you have 2 parts 2 bodies
solution: select your bodies -> right mouse click -> make a new part
to be: 1 part 2 bodies

remesh
nina1234 and zeldaa like this.
__________________
best regards


******************************
press LIKE if this message was helpful
AlexanderZ is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 23, 2022, 10:15
Default
  #3
New Member
 
nina
Join Date: Jun 2022
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 3
nina1234 is on a distinguished road
Thank you very much, really helpful.
The velocity contour has the right shape now, but when I look at the streamlines around the propeller, they still get stopped...
I displayed them on a plane for better clarity. I would expect the flow to rotate a bit and then continue until the output face.
Also, when computing the thrust force value, it appears to be half of what I expect, and that is my main concern.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg velocity_contour.jpg (90.3 KB, 14 views)
File Type: jpg velocity_streamlines.jpg (91.8 KB, 10 views)
zeldaa likes this.

Last edited by nina1234; June 23, 2022 at 14:58.
nina1234 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 23, 2022, 11:58
Default
  #4
New Member
 
nina
Join Date: Jun 2022
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 3
nina1234 is on a distinguished road
I tried with a 2D model for better efficiency in the computation time and I got the same behavior. I made everything to one part as you told me, the contour is fine but the streamlines are still considering the rotating domain as a border.
Here, the triangle is not moving, no rotation. Only the flow goes from left to right.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg contour.jpg (101.0 KB, 18 views)
File Type: jpg streamlines.jpg (140.5 KB, 15 views)
zeldaa likes this.
nina1234 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 24, 2022, 00:22
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Alexander
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,363
Rep Power: 34
AlexanderZ will become famous soon enoughAlexanderZ will become famous soon enough
from these pictures I can see, that it is cfd-post plotting issue

play with settings to plot stream line in rotation area as well.
other option: you may plot pictures inside fluent
nina1234 and zeldaa like this.
__________________
best regards


******************************
press LIKE if this message was helpful
AlexanderZ is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 27, 2022, 08:52
Default
  #6
New Member
 
nina
Join Date: Jun 2022
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 3
nina1234 is on a distinguished road
Alright, thank you very much Alexander !
Last question; any idea on why the thrust appears to be half of what I expected?
I checked the mesh quality and I tried several parameters on the time steps, doesn't change my result.
zeldaa likes this.
nina1234 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 23, 2022, 07:49
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 3
zeldaa is on a distinguished road
Hello
Iam also modeling a rotating propeller. I watched youtube tutorials. And I created a static domain and and a rotating domain and both of them are cylinder.
I created booleans in order to subtract the rotating domain from the static domain and the propeller from the rotating domain
I checked my mesh and everything looks fine.
Ansys created interfaces between both domains
I run the solution and my results for thrust and torque (the parameters that I need) were really good compare to the experiments

But my velocity contour is like what nina1234 said.

Is this a serious problem?
zeldaa is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 24, 2022, 01:00
Default
  #8
Senior Member
 
Alexander
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,363
Rep Power: 34
AlexanderZ will become famous soon enoughAlexanderZ will become famous soon enough
make a picture of veloity destribution in your domain in fluent (not cfd-post)
nina1234 and zeldaa like this.
__________________
best regards


******************************
press LIKE if this message was helpful
AlexanderZ is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 25, 2022, 02:12
Default
  #9
New Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 3
zeldaa is on a distinguished road
hello
Thanks, AlexanderZ for your reply.
I made a picture in fluent and it seems okay now, I posted a picture from the x-y plane for y velocity and its looks like what I've seen in one of my references.
but I have another question if it is okay
fluent makes interfaces automatically when I create a boolean in the design modeler, and with this auto-generated interface everything seems fine but I have some worries... how could we understand that these interfaces are correct?
what are the signs of incorrect setup for the interface?

Thank you!
Attached Images
File Type: png y velocity in xy plane-.png (51.0 KB, 10 views)
zeldaa is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 26, 2022, 02:09
Default
  #10
Senior Member
 
Alexander
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,363
Rep Power: 34
AlexanderZ will become famous soon enoughAlexanderZ will become famous soon enough
interface must have coupled boundary condition (in most cases)
you may check it if you open interface tab

on the other hand, if it diesn't most likely you will get diverged solution which leads to error or you will see, that flow/heat is not propageted from one zone to another
zeldaa likes this.
__________________
best regards


******************************
press LIKE if this message was helpful
AlexanderZ is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 26, 2022, 02:43
Default
  #11
New Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 3
zeldaa is on a distinguished road
dear AlexanderZ, thank you for your reply,
I've just checked what you said
I couldn't find the coupled option in this version(2018) but I've seen it in version 2021R1 and I've never used coupled option, and all my results are based on this.
so when I checked the mesh I can see the mesh for connected regions but there are also two walls that I can't display on the mesh tab
and also I've never got a divergence problem and everything seems fine
and based on the contour that I've shared before it seems that flow passes through the zones, am I wrong? (which contour in which plane should I check? could you please tell me)
of course, I have a problem with my streamlines like nina1234 but I've seen many people have this problem and we have to do sth in CFD-post (i don't remember right now)

about my zones: they are both fluids(air) and I use the MRF method.

so because I've never got a divergence problem and my contour is like that and also my results are close to the experiment can I trust these auto-generated interfaces?


thank you so much for your replies and help
Attached Images
File Type: png mesh interface1.png (9.1 KB, 4 views)
File Type: png mesh interface 2.png (18.1 KB, 4 views)
zeldaa is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 26, 2022, 02:48
Default
  #12
Senior Member
 
Alexander
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,363
Rep Power: 34
AlexanderZ will become famous soon enoughAlexanderZ will become famous soon enough
flow passes zones correctly, dob;t seem any problems here, no problems with streamlines as well (problem was with the way you made a picture in cfd-post)
you can trust this interface
zeldaa likes this.
__________________
best regards


******************************
press LIKE if this message was helpful
AlexanderZ is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 26, 2022, 03:00
Default
  #13
New Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 3
zeldaa is on a distinguished road
dear AlexanderZ,
yes I've seen others have problems too and the solution is here I think (I've shared the link in case someone need it)
https://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/Ansy...f_reference.3F

Thank you so much for your help AlexanderZ
zeldaa is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
propeller


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ANSYS Workbench on "Uncertified" Linux Distros hsr CFX 289 April 20, 2023 09:23
sliding mesh problem in CFX Saima CFX 46 September 11, 2021 07:38
Ansys Error: Unassigned interface zone detected Souma ANSYS 0 October 20, 2020 05:15
An error has occurred in cfx5solve: volo87 CFX 5 June 14, 2013 17:44
Frozen Rotor 1:1 Mesh Connection pharley CFX 5 January 31, 2013 16:15


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:49.