|
[Sponsors] |
Non-Premixed Combustion in a Rocket Application |
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Overview
I have a bipropellant rocket engine combustion simulation utilizing gaseous propellants that I'd like to model within ANSYS Fluent but had several questions and clarifications. I have listed the model setup below. ________________________________________ Model Setup SST K-omega: All default settings. Energy Option (On) Species: Non-Premixed Combustion Compressibility Effects: (On) State Relation: Chemical Equilibrium Energy Treatment: Non-Adiabatic Equilibrium Operating Pressure: 14.7 PSI Fuel Stream Rich Flammability Limit: 0.6875 Boundary: CH4, Fuel: 1 O2, Oxid: 1 All else, 0 Temperature for both, 300K Table: Default Table Parameter Settings except for, Minimum Temperature: 273 K Inlets 2 mass-flow inlets; 1 for the methane inlet, 1 for the oxygen inlet. Turbulence Intensity: 5% Hydraulic Diameter: (Fluid diameter of inlet). Outlet (Pressure-outlet) Turbulence: Intensity: 5% Hydraulic Diameter: (Fluid diameter of exit nozzle) Backflow Total Temperature: 1700K (an arbitrary guess) Solution Methods: All methods default except for, Pressure: Selected PRESTO! Controls: All controls default except for, Body Forces: Input "0.8" Hybrid Initialization Time Scale Factor: 1 ________________________________________ Questions 1. A rocket engine gradually increases in speed from subsonic (~0.3) in the combustion chamber to Mach 1 at the throat then proceeds to go through the supersonic regime out of the nozzle. Is utilizing the "Compressibility Effects" option as part of the Non-Premixed Combustion model applicable? Official tutorial documents state to "use caution" with the compressible model. 2. Is the "Equilibrium Operating Temperature" within the Non-Premixed Combustion menu supposed to be the design Chamber Pressure of the rocket engine? Or is this the ambient pressure? 3. The flammability ternary diagram for methane and oxygen is below (Source; Mashuga, Crowl 1999). For a mixture without nitrogen, the highlighted scale is used to get the mixture fraction for oxygen/methane. The fuel-rich flammability limit in this diagram is around 0.6875 (corresponding to an oxygen fraction of 0.3125). On pg. 2077 of the ANSYS Fluent User Guide, it says that "A fuel stream rich flammability limit of approximately twice the stoichiometric mixture fraction is appropriate". For ox/methane mixtures the stoichiometric mixture fraction is 0.2 (as per the Fluent PDF calculation) therefore the calculated fuel stream rich flammability limit would be (2 * 0.2) = 0.4. However that is still below the 0.6875 that is shown in the graph. Which value is correct to use in this application? 4. What is "Backflow Total Temperature"? I was instructed to input an arbitrary guess but do not understand the calculation behind it. Is it the backflow of the fluid or the ambient environment recirculating? Thank you! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
combustion, non premixed combustion, rocket |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Exact differenc between partially premixed combustion and species transport in fluent | Jegan | FLUENT | 7 | December 3, 2019 06:23 |
Premixed combustion ice | mattiad | FLUENT | 0 | July 13, 2019 08:18 |
non premixed combustion with ''compressibility effects'' enabled | Muneeb | FLUENT | 5 | November 15, 2018 03:06 |
Partially premixed combustion - model: less/ no temperature rise | sanjeetlimbu | Fluent Multiphase | 5 | April 21, 2015 21:13 |
Non premixed combustion | dvd91 | FLUENT | 0 | December 23, 2014 16:34 |