|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Eglantin Gjoni
Join Date: Feb 2023
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 4 ![]() |
Hi,
I am running a 3D CFD on an axisymmetric body (a 18deg sector) of a fuel injection system. The purpose is to extract the CH4 mass fraction profile at a specific location. When running the CFD after generating the mesh with FLUENT Meshing, I noticed unstable behavior of the solution in steady state. Therefore I switched to transient and the unsteady behavior continued. I concluded then that the unstable flow is characteristic of the domain. What I did next is running different transient simulation with different time-steps and perform FFT of one of my monitors. Based on the frequency, I extracted the main period of the oscillation. This was useful since it helped me understand how many periods I wanted to average, therefore how many timesteps. I proceeded then running the simulations for certain, say, 20k timesteps and averaged only after 15k the exact number of timesteps that would correspond to 5 periods. The question is: is this a reasonable approach? All my previous CFD had stable solutions but this new domain is giving me a hard time due to its instability. NOTE: The timestep has also a great impact on the profile so I did a time-step sensitivity study. A feedback would be very much appreciated. Thanks |
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| SU2 7.0.7 Built on CentOS 7, parallel computation pyscript mpi exit error? | EternalSeekerX | SU2 | 3 | October 9, 2020 19:28 |
| Filtering DNS solutions Vs projecting filtered DNS solution | juliom | Main CFD Forum | 5 | May 19, 2016 17:06 |
| Fluent profile reading for another solution | ozgulo | FLUENT | 3 | January 22, 2016 08:26 |
| grid dependancy | gueynard a. | Main CFD Forum | 19 | June 27, 2014 22:22 |
| Wall functions | Abhijit Tilak | Main CFD Forum | 6 | February 5, 1999 02:16 |