|
[Sponsors] |
February 26, 2000, 08:35 |
Limitations of the DPM
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi everybody,
I would like to track some inert ash particles through a freeboard of an FBC. I would like to use particles of different sizes (30; 5 and 0,6 micros). My problem is now that the results for all the particles are the same. Concerning the measurements in the boiler, that is not a realistic result. Has the DPM any limitation according the particle sizes? In the documentation this point is not mentioned. rgds roman |
|
March 9, 2000, 03:31 |
Re: Limitations of the DPM
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi Roman: I think you should choose perhaps different scattering coefficient for different size distribution.
|
|
March 9, 2000, 03:38 |
Re: Limitations of the DPM
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi! Thanks for the answer.
Excuse me please, I think I didn't display my problem clearly. The results I want to achieve is that I track the particles and see where they hit the walls. And in this case the results for the different particle sizes are the same. The small particles hit the walls instead of following the flow. That's my problem. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
DPM Conservation Equations Help | sgelman | FLUENT | 0 | July 14, 2010 15:27 |
DPM modeling | Mohsin | FLUENT | 0 | March 31, 2010 23:11 |
DPM post proc problem | Stel_K | FLUENT | 1 | March 27, 2009 10:42 |
DPM - do the particles affect the liquid? | Nikhil Dani | FLUENT | 0 | January 1, 2009 12:58 |
slow after mesh for enhanced wall treat DPM | joshkemp | FLUENT | 0 | May 1, 2007 18:20 |