|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hy, I now again have the problem (it's not a big problem, but I want to discuss it) to make a 2-d-mesh. One the one side I want to use the 2-layer-wall-model, on the other side a 2-d-problem should be a fast thing and for this I can use only a few cells. What aspect-ratios at the nearest-wall-cell are still ok ? I tried a few times the "transition"-button to get "bigger" cells at the end of the boundary-layer, sometimes it works, sometimes (at more complicated geometries) it doesn't. What's your experience (usability + convergence) with those "transition-boundary-layers"? What sense has the "internal-continuity"-button? A fluent-man once said to me, those transition-boundaries are not good for convergence....? Do you mesh those "easy" things with another mesher than gambit where you can manipulate the cells more individually ? tom
|
|
|
||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| [ANSYS Meshing] Migrating from GAMBIT to ANSYS Meshing | David-CFD | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 1 | April 1, 2011 06:22 |
| Best Meshing scheme for Cylinder | Nutrex | Main CFD Forum | 4 | July 29, 2008 12:03 |
| Meshing locks workbench window. | andy2o | CFX | 0 | February 1, 2008 06:01 |
| Singularity of grid?Volume meshing vs face meshing | Ken | Main CFD Forum | 0 | September 4, 2003 12:09 |
| Volume Meshing & Face Meshing? singularity of grid | ken | FLUENT | 0 | September 4, 2003 12:08 |