|
[Sponsors] |
December 19, 2000, 03:44 |
MACH=25 HAVE YOU TRIED ?
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi, ANYBODY TRIED MACH=25 ? ANY SUGGESTION HOW TO SET UP A CASE TO MAKE IT CONVERGE ? BC, OPERATING PRESSURE ETC.. THANK YOU.
|
|
December 19, 2000, 15:53 |
Re: MACH=25 HAVE YOU TRIED ?
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I have tested Fluent for hypersonic flow (Ma=7 to 25) for 2D-axysimmetric cases and Fluent works good. It match really good the experimental result (I didn't try it with 3d cases)
The settings that I used in my project was: BC +Pressure_far_field for the outside +Axis +Wall for the surface of rocket Procedure to get a converge solution 1. Initial run with cold combustion 2. Once that we have a good convergence in cold combustion, then we activate the dissociating equations 3. If we consider catalytic effects, these ones have to be considered as a third stage. That is, run the point 2 without catalytic effects and once that we have a converged solution - set the catalytic BC It is important to start with a good mesh (otherwise you won't get converged results), although it will needed a couple of refine mesh to get accuracy results. Here you have to play with time-accurancy Solver: Couple Implicit Important: don't increase the Clk number more than 1 Start with a low Clk number (0.01 or 0.1) and increase it very little by little - otherwise the process will not converge PATXI |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|