# diffusivity

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 February 16, 2001, 05:01 diffusivity #1 Joerg Brozio Guest   Posts: n/a Hi, I am just trying to use the porous media model including transport eqaution. Therefore I need to deifine a direction dependent diffusivity. A si have seen, this is not directly possible. So I inetended to use the scalar transport equation including diffusivity and source term. In the source term there has to be included a diffusion term, i.e. I need to get the second gradient of a UDS in space. I havenīt seen anything like this. Is this somehow possible? Or has somebody a different idea? Thanks for help.

 February 18, 2001, 03:11 Re: diffusivity #2 Greg Perkins Guest   Posts: n/a You can write a user defined diffusivity for you user scalars thus eliminating the need to get the second derivatives. Though you can get the first derivative by accesing C_UDSI_G(c,t,i)[x] where i = scalar number, x = direction = 0,1,2 Greg

 February 19, 2001, 04:56 Re: diffusivity #3 Joerg Brozio Guest   Posts: n/a Thank you Greg, I will try this. It just seemed to me, that it is not possible to return a vector diffusivity from the UDF (define diffusivity macro). At least I read out of the manual that diffusivity has to be a scalar. So the problem seems to be smaller than I thought. Bye Joerg

 February 19, 2001, 18:01 Re: diffusivity #4 Greg Perkins Guest   Posts: n/a Oh, yeah you might be right - sorry I wasn't sure what you meant. Yes I think that you are correct and it may not be so easy. I believe Fluent will apply the returned diffusivity to all gradient terms. Getting around this may not be very easy - since you'd have to calculate the source term yourself. I'm not sure you can access directly second derivatives - though ask Fluent. You could try by passing the scalar - ie temperature - to a scalar uds, then taking the gradient of the gradient using the C_UDSI_G(c,t,i)[x] macro (see previous posts) twice. Whether this is good numerically I'm not sure. Greg

 February 20, 2001, 04:29 Re: diffusivity #5 Joerg Brozio Guest   Posts: n/a Thanks again, Greg!!! I think this is a very good idea of yours. I hope to the numerical problems will be not so great!! bye Joerg

 February 21, 2001, 14:00 Re: equ number in source #6 Joerg Brozio Guest   Posts: n/a Hi Greg, just set up my UDF. Was able to compile it and will test to run it today. While setting it up I saw one difficulty. To enhance stability of the solver, it is recommended to define the gradient of the source term with respect to all coupled equations. The equation number is passed as an argument to the DEFINE_SOURCE macro. Actually with my code I got different source terms with gradients dependent on several UDS. So I need to know the equation number of the transport equations. Can you (or somebody else) give me a hint where to find it?? I searched the UDF manual for it, but wasnīt succesful. Thanks a lot again. I hope I will remember to set UDF in the UDF list at cfd-online, just in case it really works. bye Joerg

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post gemini FLUENT 6 August 7, 2012 07:37 aleisia FLUENT 0 March 5, 2011 23:08 bfa OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 2 July 8, 2009 21:35 circle2000 FLUENT 0 September 20, 2004 22:12 zhou1 FLUENT 0 November 4, 2003 18:23

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:33.