|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Can anyone tell me the multiphase capabilities of fluent? Is three phase, (a non-newtonian liquid, a gas and solid particles) pipe flow modelling possible? I believe that until Fluent 6 is released, Fluent 4.5 has to be used for this type of multiphase modelling. Is this the case? Is it possible to model the different flow patterns associated with gas-liquid pipe flow (i.e. stratified, slug, annular, bubble etc.)? Any answers would be appreciated.
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In principle the Eulerian model of fluent is k-fluid so it must be able to handle 3 phases or more, and yes, this model is only available in fluent 4.5 and will be available in fluent 6 in june 2001 ( according to the fluent engineers).
Depending on the flow you're interested, the model of choice must be different, for example if you are modeling stratified, slug or annular flow I would suggest to explore the VOF model (available in fluent 5), but if you are modeling bubble flow it's almost sure that you must use a Lagrangian approach. For the solid particles-liquid-gas I'm not sure, it must depend on the concentration of solids (granular model?) and volume fraction of the gas, and if it can be considered as a diluted liquid or not, but I'm sure there must be somebody else that can give you a better answer that I would like to hear. As you see there's no simple answer to your question. Hope this helps Sincerely Arturo |
|
|
||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Difference of multicomponent and multiphase homogenous flows | Luk_Fiz | CFX | 11 | April 4, 2013 06:29 |
| Use data from multiphase into DO radiation | yashmash | FLUENT | 0 | October 7, 2011 04:57 |
| multiphase multicomponent physics | ckleanth | CFX | 3 | June 4, 2009 21:15 |
| About the multiphase flow | Xue | FLUENT | 4 | September 19, 2008 14:05 |
| Multiphase flow modeling | Paul | CFX | 2 | August 11, 2003 10:41 |