# Which one is more accurate,Segregated or Coupled

 User Name Remember Me Password
 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 July 3, 2001, 01:24 Which one is more accurate,Segregated or Coupled #1 sean Guest   Posts: n/a I'm working with FLUENT 5.4, and find that the iteration rate with Segregated solver is much higher than that with Coupled solver. Now I have obtained a converged solution using the Segregated one. How ever, I am not clear whether it is accurate or not. Is the Coupled solver is more accurate than the Segregated one? thanks. sean.

 July 5, 2001, 09:33 Re: Which one is more accurate,Segregated or Coupl #2 Alex Guest   Posts: n/a If you have converged solutions, they should be equally accurate. The iteration rate with the segregate solver may be higher, but you need many more iteration to reach a converged solution. The coupled solver is more efficient. With a coupled solver, you might get a converged solution in a few dozen iterations where with the segregate solver it may take a few hundred or even thousands.

 July 5, 2001, 16:36 Re: Which one is more accurate,Segregated or Coupl #3 Jonas Larsson Guest   Posts: n/a Just a few comments - if you have shocks the coupled solver resolves them much better. Only use the segregated solver for incompressible and subsonic cases. I don't agree that the coupled solver is faster in general. For most low-speed pressure driven cases the segregated solver is much faster. The coupled solver can be more robust if you have, for example, strong system rotation, or other things which make the problem more stiff. I used to use the coupled solver much more than I do now. I come from the "compressible" world of CFD and hence that was my first choice. With time the segregated solver has become my favoutite though. It is really a very robust and fast solver for being a commercial code. The coupled solver needs some further work from Fluent to come close to the numerics of other good coupled solvers IMHO.

 July 6, 2001, 08:04 Re: Which one is more accurate,Segregated or Coupl #4 Alex Guest   Posts: n/a I must say I don't have experience with Fluent's coupled solver. My experience has been with CFX TascFlow's solver which is fantastic. So I agree that how they implement it is important.

 July 6, 2001, 08:16 Re: Which one is more accurate,Segregated or Coupl #5 Jonas Larsson Guest   Posts: n/a I've also heard that TascFlow's coupled solver is very good. I haven't had the chance to test it myself though. Anyone who have experence from both Fluent's coupled solver and TascFlow's coupled solver?

 July 6, 2001, 12:52 Re: Which one is more accurate,Segregated or Coupl #6 John C. Chien Guest   Posts: n/a (1). I have used Fluent codes and CFX-TASCflow codes extensively in the last several years. (2). I think, the Fluent/coupled used to be called Fluent/Rampant which is "density-based". This is the main-stream approach for compressible flows and is always a transient approach. It tries to capture the waves, sound waves, Mach waves, or shock waves. It is not suitable for low subsonic flows, in general. Therefore, it is not suitable for internal flows, which is mostly subsonic. (3). The CFX-TASCflow code is "pressure-based". I called this the "Imperial College approach", suitable for subsonic flows. It is incompressible-flow based with upwind schemes. In the turbomachinery applications, if you use the wall function (which is not a good choice anyway) with corase mesh, the convergence speed is faster than the "density-based appraoch" (this is well-known fact in general, that's why you need super-computers) (4). The problem is: when you are looking for accurate solution, say using Low Renolds number turbulence model (Tascflow has a 2-layer model)instead of using wall function treatment, you will need fine mesh near the wall. In this case, it is very hard to get the code started. It diverged right away. And the only way to get it started was to use extremely small time step (it is a transient formulation), and ramp up the time step gradually. It required a lot of effort to do so. Well, when you can put it under the control, it will converge faster. (5). So, when someone says he is getting fast convergence, you have to guess that he is getting not-so accurate solutions. (relative to my requirement) (6). So, one should not make the direct comparison between the two. They are two different things, meant for different flow problems. But TASCflow by formulation is suitable for internal flows. (this does not mean that the solution is accurate. The loss predicted for turbomachinery flow were several times off.)

 July 8, 2001, 00:13 Re: Which one is more accurate,Segregated or Coupl #7 sean Guest   Posts: n/a Dear Alex, I agree with your opion. I found that when I run the coupled solver, then hard-disk shakes and the machine becomes so slow in responsing me. One iteration may cost scores of hours. On the other hand, the segerated one convergences much faster. Though it may cost more iterations, I do get a solution. Of course, I am computing a incompressible and subsonic gas flow.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post bearcat Main CFD Forum 0 February 14, 2010 21:40 lucioantonio FLUENT 0 April 3, 2009 10:21 Alex Siemens 5 December 12, 2007 05:58 cfdfans FLUENT 0 November 25, 2003 05:48 CD adapco Group Marketing Siemens 1 November 13, 2002 16:48

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:37.

 Contact Us - CFD Online - Privacy Statement - Top