|
[Sponsors] |
May 29, 2002, 04:28 |
why I can only use SIMPLE of 1 order?
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I'm computing a combustion chamber of an engine which has two subsonic air inlets, a fuel inlet and a nozzle.
I set 1 the air inlets as pressure inlets with totol pressure of about 950000 Pa; 2 the fuel inlet as mass flow inlet with mass flux of 0.09kg/s; 3 the nozzle as pressure outlet with 26000Pa. I use ideal-gas model, K-E turbulence model with standard wall function. And I used tets mesh, no boundary grid. Only with SIMPLE method of one order, I got a converged result. But when I switch to two order simple method, it didn't converge. I don't know why? Any one give some advices? |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SIMPLE algorithm in 3D cylindrical coordinates | zouchu | Main CFD Forum | 1 | January 20, 2014 17:02 |
Order of accuracy: 1st or 2nd order? | fisch | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | July 6, 2011 04:37 |
divergence with higher order scheme | shekharc | Main CFD Forum | 1 | July 23, 2009 13:53 |
DNS Incompressible : poisson order and Div(Ui) | moomba | Main CFD Forum | 8 | May 26, 2009 08:17 |
4th and 5th Order TVD Runge-Kutta Methods | saygin | Main CFD Forum | 2 | January 30, 2006 11:45 |