|
[Sponsors] |
February 7, 2003, 05:12 |
Validation
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
How can you validate a solution using Fluent? I have used the mass flow rate flux to see if the solution is valid. For flow in and flow out the net result is 1.401077e-09kg/s. Should this equal zero or is this an acceptable result? Please advise. John. |
|
February 7, 2003, 10:13 |
Re: Validation
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
If your flow rates are in the order of magnitude of 1E-8 kg/s then your mass flux error would be too big, 10%. If your flow rates are in the order of magnitude of 1E+8 kg/s then your mass flux report error would be damn small...
I guess anything under 0.1% is good enough. What do you think yourself? |
|
February 7, 2003, 11:23 |
Re: Validation
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks Erwin,
That makes sense now. Just wasn't thinking earlier. I have no idea what percentage is acceptable. Is it up to the user to decide what level is accceptable or is there some kind of standard? |
|
February 11, 2003, 09:32 |
Re: Validation
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Erwin,
I just found this in the Fluent 5.5, 2D Centrifugal Blower tutorial, post-processing - "The net mass imbalance should be no more than a small fraction (say, 0.5%) of the total flux through the system. If a significant imbalance occurs, you should decrease your residual tolerances by at least an order of magnitude and continue iterating". John |
|
February 16, 2003, 10:04 |
Re: Validation
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
There you go. I usually find that in most problems that I do mass balance is not a big issue, energy balance on the other hand can be tough, especially when radiation is involved.
Cheers Erwin |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Validation test for 2d euler equations in subsonic regime with canonical squares | panou | Main CFD Forum | 2 | August 24, 2011 15:21 |
Validation of Star CCM+ | iand | Siemens | 2 | December 8, 2010 06:59 |
Validation cases | GGerber | OpenFOAM | 7 | October 30, 2010 04:11 |
Oscillating flow around cylinder validation error | Zak | FLUENT | 0 | September 22, 2005 16:09 |
Urgent: RAE 2822 validation | NID | Main CFD Forum | 0 | September 3, 2004 10:34 |