CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > FLUENT

Y+ adaption and turbulence model

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   April 8, 2003, 20:29
Default Y+ adaption and turbulence model
Posts: n/a
Hello everyone, 1 When I use Y+/Y* Adaption to refine, how do I set the ¡°Max Allowed¡±? 2 When I use fluent to simulate 3D flow field in compressor, I find the streamline distribution on the suction surface exhibit differently if I employ different turbulent model(the k-epsilon Standard model, RNG model and Realizable model). In the results of the last two models, the streamline distribution deteriorate and don¡¯t accord with the actual status. What¡¯s the reason? And what should I do? Thank you!

  Reply With Quote

Old   April 8, 2003, 23:15
Default Re: Y+ adaption and turbulence model
Cindy Jones
Posts: n/a

For your first question, I believe you can set your "Max Allowed" around 60~120 (different book has different standard). By the way, from my experience, it is not good to refine your grid using this way. It will give you too many grids. The better way is to build a boundary layer from Gambit and set your first point next to the wall according to the Y+

I am not familiar with compressor. But you do have to choose a right turbulent model according to the specific problem you are working on. And please don't cheat Fluent as a 'black box", that will be very "dangerous" :-D

Good luck

  Reply With Quote

Old   April 9, 2003, 03:10
Default Re: Y+ adaption and turbulence model
Posts: n/a
Thank you for your advice! But I don¡¯t know what the unit of Y+ and how to set the first point next to the wall according to the Y+. what is your idea? Thanks! raintung
  Reply With Quote

Old   April 10, 2003, 09:15
Default Re: Y+ adaption and turbulence model
Posts: n/a

Y+ is the normalised wall distance and is described by the equation; y+=(yU*)/v, where y is the distance normal to the solid, U* is the wall friction velocity and v is the Kinematic viscosity.


Unfortunately the 'Black Box' approach seems to me to be the way that industry what's to go in, due to commercial pressures wanting quick reliable results - for example Nastran (FEA code) as developed such a tool in the form of visual Nastran, which is import the geometry and press a button. Therefore surely we most ensure that robust model are developed for this purpose.


  Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
mass flow in is not equal to mass flow out saii CFX 2 September 18, 2009 08:07
Mesh adaption in a wake at low Re. Pascal CFX 17 February 10, 2009 20:01
Help with Turbulence Model Yashwant Ganti FLUENT 0 June 7, 2007 02:40
grid adaption problem justin FLUENT 3 April 8, 2006 10:45
Sensitive y+ grid adaption Marc FLUENT 0 December 2, 2005 11:49

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:05.