
[Sponsors] 
May 7, 2003, 18:59 
Convergence Question

#1 
Guest
Posts: n/a

Hi, there. If the residual of continuity doesn't fall below 0.001, what should I do to get convergence? Adjust relaxation factor? Or adjust the mesh? Anything else? What the "thumb of rules" of these adjustments?


May 7, 2003, 20:51 
Re: Convergence Question

#2 
Guest
Posts: n/a

Hi Colin, I don't know the problem you're solving, so I'll try to give some general advice.
 First of all you should check if your problem is wellposed. Verify all boundary conditions.  Check your grid and refine it, if necessary.  If you're doing unsteady calculations, try to reduce time step and/or increase the number of iteration per time step.  Try to reduce underrelaxation factors.  Try different discretization schemes.  Change solver settings in the Solve>Multigrid dialog box (read the manual for more info). Hi ap 

May 7, 2003, 21:13 
Re: Convergence Question

#3 
Guest
Posts: n/a

I met the same problem, convergence approach steadily at first, but then the residuals will level off(explict solver). I don't know what should I do. I set the some of the parameters under FAS Multigrid Controls , but divergence appears.


May 7, 2003, 21:47 
Re: Convergence Question

#4 
Guest
Posts: n/a

I think AP has given us some good ideas. Just try, maybe it works.
Thanks Ap. 

May 8, 2003, 09:34 
Re: Convergence Question

#5 
Guest
Posts: n/a

If you give some datail of the problem you're solving, maybe I can be more specific.
Hi 

May 8, 2003, 21:13 
Re: Convergence Question

#6 
Guest
Posts: n/a

Can you give me some advice? I am simulating the 3Dflow field in compressor. The mesh is semistructured and the boundary conditions obtain from the experiment. Because there is a thin fence on the endwall, it is very difficult to get desirable mesh and convergence is not easy. I use keplison Realizable model. What should I do? Thanks.


May 9, 2003, 08:59 
Re: Convergence Question

#7 
Guest
Posts: n/a

It seems a complex situation...
I assume your boundary conditions are good, because you have them from experiments. So try to check mesh quality and, if possible, refine it where quality is really low. You can try to remesh your domain using unstructured grids, if it's too difficult to refine the semistructured one. If this doesn't work, try to reduce underrelaxation factors and to increase the number of iteration on the internal cycle (Multigrid panel). However, changing parameters of the solver may help, but doesn't solve problems due to a poor quality mesh Good work ap 

May 9, 2003, 21:13 
Re: Convergence Question

#8 
Guest
Posts: n/a

Thank you. I will try to do that.


May 9, 2003, 21:47 
Re: Convergence Question

#9 
Guest
Posts: n/a

Can I ask you a simple question? We often say ˇ°refining meshˇ±, but how many means can we do that effectively? Thank you.


May 10, 2003, 18:21 
Re: Convergence Question

#10 
Guest
Posts: n/a

I'm not sure I understood your question.
You want to know how you can refine a mesh? Personally, I don't like grid adaption tools which are integrated in FLUENT. Usually they increase too much the number of cells. I prefer to use Gambit and to remesh the system by hand, choosing the number of nodes on the edges of my domain where I want to improve mesh quality. It requires more time, but I think it can give better results without increasing the number of cells too much. Hi 

May 10, 2003, 21:02 
Re: Convergence Question

#11 
Guest
Posts: n/a

Thank you! I think it is a good idea. I quite agree with you.


May 16, 2003, 04:41 
Re: Convergence Question

#12 
Guest
Posts: n/a

when you remesh in gambit, is it possible to then effectively patch the data from the previous analysis even though the mesh has changed?


May 16, 2003, 08:35 
Re: Convergence Question

#13 
Guest
Posts: n/a

If the geometry doesn't change, you could use the Gridtogrid solution interpolation function.
See the post: GRID TO GRID INTERPOLATION in FLENT for a link to the page of the manual. Hi ap 

May 16, 2003, 11:41 
Re: Convergence Question

#14 
Guest
Posts: n/a

cheers ap i was fairly sure it could be done but didnt know what it was called!


Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Time step dependence of convergence behavior of steady state simulations in CFX  Chander  Main CFD Forum  5  December 23, 2013 06:31 
Convergence Question  racerdude777  Main CFD Forum  2  March 14, 2011 23:07 
Convergence Question  James  FLUENT  2  October 29, 2005 14:59 
Question about convergence criteria?  Thomas  FLUENT  7  April 8, 2005 19:38 
help! cyclone convergence question  Lcw  FLUENT  1  January 26, 2005 16:29 