# Continuity

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 May 14, 2003, 11:35 Continuity #1 DAE Guest   Posts: n/a Sponsored Links Hi I am modelling the flow of an incompressible fluid through a structure. Due to the complexity of this structure, the use of hexahedral elements is not practical, thus tetrahedral are being used. My question to anyone that can help is, do you know why I am getting a net gain of mass of 1.6kg/s when the mass-flowrate is 6kg/s. The solver is steady state. The inlet is a velocity inlet, and the outlets are velocity inlets with negative velocities. I have tried pressure outlets, but for my problem, setting the correct pressure on the boundary is not easy to get continuity right, thus the use of pressure outlets is not practical either. Each velocity inlet has a minimum of 6 cells across the diameter, thus providing one either side of the inlet for a crude boundary layer, and 4 for the bulk of the flow. Thanks

 May 14, 2003, 15:23 Re: Continuity #2 ap Guest   Posts: n/a Why don't you try using Outflow as boundary conditions for your outlets? Outflow BC imposes a zero diffusion flux of all variables and applies a mass balance correction. All others variables are calculated supposing a fully developed flow. This boundary can't be used if flow density changes, if you're using Pressure Inlets, or if you're modeling compressible flows (not your case). Hi ap

 May 14, 2003, 16:33 Re: Continuity #3 Shiping Liu Guest   Posts: n/a I think the solution is not convergent.

 May 15, 2003, 00:17 Re: Continuity #4 Alex Munoz Guest   Posts: n/a Hi The solver is given to you a solution for the condition that you impose. In other word, you must to 1) increase the number of elements 2) impose a velocity profile at the inlet 3) inpose a turbulent kinetic energy at the inlet 4) impose a dissitation rate of the TKE at the inlet. 5) Use second order upwind 6) Use Presure outlet 7) Use pressure velocity SIMPLEC Finally, Tetrahedral mesh are characterizad for numerical diffusion. Therefore, You must to increase the number of elements per volume. Keep in mind that not too many works has been than with it, and also the ones reported are 2-D. It is my guess that yo have a large domain in 3-D. By the way, Mr Liu coment about lack of convergence take it as a lack of convergence to the true solution not to a mathematical solution. Regards Alex Munoz

 May 15, 2003, 06:41 Re: Continuity #5 John Guest   Posts: n/a I don't think your comments are right at all: the mass is always conserved in finite-volume based method regardless the mesh density, mesh topology, turbulent or laminar, SIMPLE or SIMPLEC, upwind or HOD.

 May 15, 2003, 17:13 Re: Continuity #6 Anton Guest   Posts: n/a If you are specifying velocity at the both the inlet and outlets of your model, then you are fixing the mass coming in and leaving, assuming constant density. Go back and double check that your inlet velocity multiplied by your inlet area is IDENTICALLY equal to your outlet velocity multiplied by your outlet area.

 May 20, 2003, 12:33 Re: Continuity #7 Ashish Guest   Posts: n/a Hi DAE, Are you getting reverse flow at the outlet ? As you don't know the exact pressure outlet bc, you try outflow bc. Run for about 100 to 200 iterations. take the total pressure value at the outlet and put it as pressure outlet bc. (i have tried this for my problem this works very well) bye, Ashish

 October 26, 2011, 01:14 #8 New Member   satyendra Join Date: Jun 2010 Posts: 15 Rep Power: 9 hi ashish, i am trying to solve an incompressible ideal gas problem having two mass flow inlet conditions and two pressure outlet conditions ( i cannot use outflow BC since according to chapter 7, fluent user guide this is not allowed ). hence I have set target mass flow at outlet. But the continuity is not converging. any idea where i am going wrong. rana

 October 26, 2011, 08:57 #9 New Member   amir mofakham Join Date: Feb 2011 Posts: 8 Rep Power: 8 I think you cannot define the velocity outlet and inlet. For example, if the velocity inlet is specified the outlet velocity is less than inlet velocity because of the drop pressure (viscosity). So one of them can be defined and the other one will be calculated.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post xiuying OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 8 August 27, 2013 15:33 lr103476 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 30 November 19, 2007 15:09 skabilan OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 12 September 17, 2007 17:48 msrinath80 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 9 July 22, 2007 02:58 liugx212 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 3 January 4, 2006 19:07