# 3D velocity profile

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 July 27, 2003, 04:29 3D velocity profile #1 S. Sarkar Guest   Posts: n/a Sponsored Links I have a laminar, viscous 3D flow in a duct (brick type geometry) with rectangular cross-section. I want to use velocity inlet and pressure outlet boundary conditions. There is a nice expression for fully-developed velocity profile (parabola) in 2D (written in terms of u_max). How is it written in 3D? Any help or reference will be highly appreciated. Thanks in anticipation. S.S.

 July 27, 2003, 05:47 Re: 3D velocity profile #2 Lola Guest   Posts: n/a I don't think you know the profile to rectangulat inlet, do you ? You know it for a circular inlet. Lola

 July 27, 2003, 09:36 Re: 3D velocity profile #3 Mirek Kabacinski Guest   Posts: n/a Hi, I dealt with the same problem. Solution of this problem is very simple. Let Fluent do it itself. They are two ways: 1. You can construct long inflow section such long as your fluid needs to create stable rectangular velocity proflie (its long depends on velocity, if your fluid flows faster then your run-up section must be longer). At the velocity-inlet B.C. type your mean velocity. 2. You can construct long brick with the same B.C. and at the outlet (or before it-check it by display velocity contour where is the best profile, here you must previously create new plane in cross-section of this brick)write velocity profile. The next step is read this profile in your problem and set it in velocity-inlet B.C. changing it in drop-down list from constant to .... it depends on the name of profile you used). And the next steps you know, I think. Good luck! If You had any problem I can help You again. Mirek

 July 28, 2003, 18:12 Re: 3D velocity profile #4 S. Sarkar Guest   Posts: n/a Hello! Thanks a lot for your suggestions. Your suggestion no. 1 would not work for me because I'm doing 3D simulation on my PC and if I add extra section to the inlet, that will require more mesh elements and I may easily run into memory problems. Your suggestion no. 2 was great! I tried it, and it appeared to work pretty well. I was reading from the manual that there were different options for writing a profile such as point, line and mesh. However I didn't get any option - when I wrote the profile it was automatically written as point profile. I suppose the profile was written with cell-centered value, and I observed that when I displayed the profile (after reading it back and hooking it to the inlet), it wasn't showing the right values (zero) at the walls. Was it a problem of node interpolations? Anyways, that was a minor difference and I'm quite happy with the overall agreement. Thank you again for your kind help. Best regards.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post cfdworker Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming 25 July 13, 2017 03:44 cfdworker Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming 0 April 23, 2009 19:09 cfdworker FLUENT 2 April 17, 2009 23:36 Alan Main CFD Forum 10 October 28, 2005 12:14 Abhi Main CFD Forum 12 July 8, 2002 09:11