CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Boundary type for solid-liquid interface

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   September 11, 2003, 13:24
Default Boundary type for solid-liquid interface
  #1
Jake
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi,

I am modelling conjugate heat transfer for fluid flowing through rectangular channel with a certain wall thickness and heat flux on the outer wall. What boundary type should I specify (in Gambit) for the solid-fluid interface that will allow me to extract the internal wall temperatures easily in Fluent?

Thanks in advance.
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 12, 2003, 05:31
Default Re: Boundary type for solid-liquid interface
  #2
Fernando Lopez Parra
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi. This is a wild guess, so I do not know whether it will work, but you could try. When you generate your model in gambit, you can create a face with the edges that form the your solid wall. Then, in the boudary conditions panel you can also find something called "continuum types". Go in there and selct "solid" form the type list and select "faces" in the drop down list at the bottom of the panel and then select the face containing your solid wall. This should export that face as a solid into FLUENT, and then you should be able to choose the material you wall is made of and the characteristics. I am not sure whether you would need to mesh the solid part as well as the liquid, that you will have to investigate, because I have never come across this type of problem. As I said this is only a guess, and I hope it does not make you waste any time. Cheers. Fernando
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 12, 2003, 05:35
Default Re: Boundary type for solid-liquid interface
  #3
Tom
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Just a note to save you a bit of time - YES you will need to mesh the solid wall if you want internal temperature information.

Best of luck
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 12, 2003, 09:20
Default Re: Boundary type for solid-liquid interface
  #4
Jake
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thanks guys for your help
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 12, 2003, 20:49
Default Re: Boundary type for solid-liquid interface
  #5
dw
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
just add a few words. When you calculate coupled heat transfer problem, you don't need to define boundary type between fluid and solid at all. It will be automatically handled by fluent as double-sided wall.
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 10, 2012, 05:40
Default
  #6
New Member
 
Learner
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Ingolstadt
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 14
raghu.tejaswi is on a distinguished road
Hi all,

I think I am replying quite late to this post.
Well I have a Q. I have a solid aluminium block which is heated from above and below. Inside the Al block, I have water flowing in rectangular ducts (a typical of plate-type heat-exchanger). I understand this is not a Fluid-Structure Interaction (FSI) problem. I need to model this in FLUENT. The main problem Im facing is the region where solid and fluid interface.

1) How exactly should the BC be defined while pre-processing?
2) Things to be understood in FLUENT.

Thanks,
Raghu
raghu.tejaswi is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wind turbine simulation Saturn CFX 58 July 3, 2020 01:13
Problem with cyclic boundaries in Openfoam 1.5 fs82 OpenFOAM 36 January 7, 2015 00:31
[mesh manipulation] Using createPatch in place of couplePatches sripplinger OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 8 November 13, 2009 07:14
pipe with buoyantFoam buoyancy, boundary conditions Thomas Baumann OpenFOAM 0 June 15, 2009 08:58
increasing mesh quality is leading to poor convergence tippo CFX 2 May 5, 2009 10:55


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:18.