# grid independence

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 December 2, 2003, 07:16 grid independence #1 chanchala Guest   Posts: n/a Hi, If you found the grid independent solution for a certain geometry using say, standard wall functions and k-epsilon turbulence model, would this mesh still be grid independent if you change to Re-stress model or non-equilibrium wall functions? Or would you have to carry out a grid indepence test again? thanks, Chanchi

 December 2, 2003, 07:21 Re: grid independence #2 chanchala Guest   Posts: n/a Another question, With non-equilibrium wall functions is there a recommended y+ value for the cells at the wall?

 December 2, 2003, 16:32 Re: grid independence #3 ap Guest   Posts: n/a The y+ range is the same of standard wall-functions (y+ between 30 and 60). For the enhanced wall treatment, you should have y+ close to 1 and, anyway, lower than 4. Hi ap

 December 3, 2003, 13:20 Re: grid independence #4 AMV Guest   Posts: n/a Why are you so much bothered about grid independence. In whatever model you are using, you will definitely find that if your entire range of y+ is less than say 500 for a grid and less than 100 for another grid, the results like velocity profile at outlet etc would match considerably. Thus the only thing you should make sure is that your y+ is < 500. Also, unless its your research topic, dont go too much details of near wall flows, as nobody knows which approach is better. If you are asking engineering solutions, then k-epsilon with std wall functions is best approach.

 December 8, 2003, 12:11 Re: grid independence #5 chanchala Guest   Posts: n/a Hi AMV (and ap), Thanks for your comments. I'm doing a PhD and my pipe geometry is very curved so I thought it might be interesting to check what the effect of the different near wall models may be since the flow is governed by the curvature of the walls. It's only as a point of interest rather than a problem actually. thanks, chanchi

 December 9, 2003, 12:20 Re: grid independence #6 AM Vaidya Guest   Posts: n/a If this is the case, then you should be really careful and should do proper exercise. Have you read following ? 1) Chen H.C., Patel V.C., Near wall turbulence models for complex flows including separation, AIAA, 26, No.6, June 1988. 2)Amano R.S., Development of a turbulence near-wall model and its application to separated and reattached flows, Numerical Heat Transfer, 7, 59 - 75, 1984. 3)Chieng C.C. and Launder B.E., On the calculation of turbulent heat transport downstream from an abrupt pipe expansion, Numerical Heat Transfer, 3, 189 -207, 1980. 6)Launder B.E. and Spalding D.B., The numerical computation of turbulent flows, Computational Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 3, 269-289, 1974.

 December 9, 2003, 12:22 Re: grid independence #7 AM Vaidya Guest   Posts: n/a I forgot to give your answer in previous answer. You will have to carry out grid independence test for each model separately.

 December 9, 2003, 12:58 Re: grid independence #8 chanchala Guest   Posts: n/a Hi Thanks so much for those references. I have reserved a few books from the library on the subject but they seem to always be out! I'll get these immediately. chanchi

 December 9, 2003, 13:04 Re: grid independence #9 AM Vaidya Guest   Posts: n/a great . you r welcome for any future discussion .

 January 11, 2004, 00:07 Re: grid independence #10 s Guest   Posts: n/a i think it is not neccesary, then we must carry out mesh study for every boudnary condition.

 January 11, 2004, 06:45 Re: grid independence #11 AMV Guest   Posts: n/a strictly speaking yes

 January 11, 2004, 07:50 Re: grid independence #12 simple Guest   Posts: n/a how can u say that . do u have any reference

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post lucifer FLUENT 0 December 14, 2009 20:59 Shane Schouten FLUENT 0 October 11, 2006 16:50 Mattis Voss FLUENT 1 November 23, 2005 11:30 chanchala FLUENT 13 November 20, 2003 09:24 Art Stretton Phoenics 5 April 2, 2002 05:59

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:21.