CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Von Karman 2D Stable, no shedding

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   March 10, 2004, 05:43
Default Von Karman 2D Stable, no shedding
Stephen Mar
Posts: n/a
I am trying to simulate the shedding of Von Karman Vortices from a 2d cylinder. However I am only seeing steady no shedding results. I have read the posting on this site, which appear to indicate that a disturbance is required before the unsteady result will be achieved. If this is the case could someone give me an Idea of what disturbance is required and how I could go about it.

Cheers!! in advance!!

The problem is set up as follows Re = 70

V = 0.001

D = 1

Fluid = Air

Domain is ten cords with Circular shaped

Velocity inlet, and velocity outlet (No external walls)

Model = Laminar

Time step = 0.00001

Have tried altering the relaxation factors

Cheers!! in advance!!

  Reply With Quote

Old   March 10, 2004, 10:13
Default Re: Von Karman 2D Stable, no shedding
Posts: n/a

If you have a look at the validations that are posted up on the Fluent website for Fluent 6.0, there is a validation that uses the vortex shedding around a cylinder. They give details about the disturbance required to initiate the vortex street.

Hope this helps

  Reply With Quote

Old   March 10, 2004, 16:46
Default Re: Von Karman 2D Stable, no shedding
Posts: n/a
Hi Stephen

The use of a disturbance may not be necessary. At least I runned this flow test some time ago for Re=100, and obtained the transient flow with good accuracy.

If your mesh is coarse or you are using first order upwind for the discretization of convective terms you may not obtain the shedding as expected.

Try using QUICK in the discretization of convection. I think it will be enough (Solve->Controls->Solution->Momentum->QUICK).

Of course you should use the unsteady solver, preferably with second order accuracy. Your time step should also be well chosen.

For Re=70 -> Strouhal = 0.15 (approx) so:

T (period) =1/f=D/(U*0.15)=1/(0.001*0.15)=6670 s

So using dt=1E-=5 you will need 667000000 time steps per shedding cicle !!!

You should use a time step of order of T/100, i.e. around 5 sec.

Hope this help, Cheers Manuel
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 16, 2004, 14:48
Default Re: Von Karman 2D Stable, no shedding
Stephen Mar
Posts: n/a
Thanks! Paul and Manual,

The help was much appreciated

  Reply With Quote


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Are these reverse von karman vortex street? quarkz Main CFD Forum 1 August 20, 2009 15:15
wmake compiling Problem with OF1.5 openTom OpenFOAM Installation 4 May 3, 2009 14:44
Numerical damping in 2D Von Karman Kristine FLUENT 0 March 11, 2004 11:50
Vortexes shedding (von karman vortexes) Mahdy Karzar Jeddy FLUENT 1 August 11, 2002 22:25
Von Karman Integral Length Scale Txingurri Main CFD Forum 0 May 2, 2002 12:05

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:28.