# Grid independence study

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 July 28, 2004, 19:59 Grid independence study #1 prasanth Guest   Posts: n/a Sponsored Links Dear friends, To study the grid independency/dependency, how should the mesh size be varied in order to check the solution at different grid sizes and get a range at which there is no variation in the solution. Thanking you for a kind response! prasanth

 July 30, 2004, 08:43 Re: Grid independence study #2 ozgur Guest   Posts: n/a Hi, You can adapt your grid and continue you simulation with the refined grid to see whether there is a significant change in the parameters. regards

 July 30, 2004, 10:59 Re: Grid independence study #3 wxl Guest   Posts: n/a Do you mean that we don't have to redo the meshing in gambit, instead, we only need to adapt grid in fluent? Thanks.

 July 30, 2004, 15:42 Re: Grid independence study #4 prasanth Guest   Posts: n/a Hello Ozgur Thanks for your reply. But, I know what you are saying, adapting the grid to refine mesh at locations of high gradients!! but I am talking about grid independence studies!! you will take 3-4 different grid sizes and like that, repeat the simulation until we get no change in solution! Thanks prasanth

 August 4, 2004, 16:57 Re: Grid independence study #5 Chetan Kadakia Guest   Posts: n/a I believe you can modify the grid based on different methods (not just high gradients), and when you are convinced that adapting the grid anywhere will not change your outcome, then you are grid independent. Your solution is 3D, the continuous adaption may not be practical. You can also refine the grid in Gambit as it seems you are about to do, but do decide where you want to make your changes based on what you are studying in the flow. May I ask what you are simulating, what model you are using, and how many cells you are going to have in your various meshes.

 August 9, 2004, 19:01 Re: Grid independence study #6 ajb Guest   Posts: n/a A good rule of thumb I use is 15 to 25% difference between subsequent grids. Sometimes it is necessary to refine grids in order to achieve values of pressure, velocity, turbulent reynolds number, y+ (if turbulent flow), etc that are appropriate. Then once those values are "believable" or close to experiment, refine grid with something like 3 or 4 or more densities. If you are in hexahedrals, you can refine in one direction at a time to ensure there is no effect from grid. Or if in tetrahedrals, a gross refinement of total cell sizes would be O.K. Finally, if tetrahedrals are use, it is always a good idea to try to create hex grid that is very close to the density of the tet grid so you can see whether there is effect of grid type. Hope it helps. rgd likes this.

 August 16, 2014, 10:53 #7 Member   ABDUL GAFOOR CP Join Date: Jul 2014 Posts: 30 Rep Power: 5 hii after doing some solutions with different grid sizes..am gettting matching result in some parameter and different result in some other parameter..... is this a grid independent solution?

 August 16, 2014, 21:40 #8 Member   le hoang anh Join Date: Oct 2012 Posts: 96 Rep Power: 6 You can make the number of cell in order 1.5 time incresing, and do calculation with same condition, if the solution is unchange to much, so you can get grid independent and chose the smallest grid fir your calculation gafoorcp likes this.

August 17, 2014, 02:10
#9
Member

ABDUL GAFOOR CP
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 30
Rep Power: 5
Quote:
 Originally Posted by lehoanganh07 You can make the number of cell in order 1.5 time incresing, and do calculation with same condition, if the solution is unchange to much, so you can get grid independent and chose the smallest grid fir your calculation
thanks sir....
is this 1.5 times increasing is a rule of thumb or can we take any other ratio for increment?

 August 17, 2014, 23:43 #10 Member   le hoang anh Join Date: Oct 2012 Posts: 96 Rep Power: 6 No, It is just my work, you can do whatever you want gafoorcp likes this.

August 18, 2014, 02:26
#11
Member

ABDUL GAFOOR CP
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 30
Rep Power: 5
Quote:
 Originally Posted by lehoanganh07 No, It is just my work, you can do whatever you want

August 19, 2014, 02:21
#12
Member

ABDUL GAFOOR CP
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 30
Rep Power: 5
Quote:
 Originally Posted by lehoanganh07 No, It is just my work, you can do whatever you want
sir...
after completing some run with different number of cells....am getting a matching result within a range of number of cells....and a different result after that range.....so can we take the range at which we r getting same solution for our actual testing....is that a valid method......
regards
gafoor

 August 19, 2014, 11:36 #13 Member   le hoang anh Join Date: Oct 2012 Posts: 96 Rep Power: 6 So it is not conv yet, I think need more grid point gafoorcp likes this.

August 19, 2014, 14:00
#14
Member

ABDUL GAFOOR CP
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 30
Rep Power: 5
Quote:
 Originally Posted by lehoanganh07 So it is not conv yet, I think need more grid point

 August 20, 2014, 01:31 #15 Member   Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: China Posts: 79 Rep Power: 9 FYI http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/wind/val.../spatconv.html In my opinion, grid independence is almost impractical, especially for engineering gafoorcp likes this.

August 20, 2014, 06:42
#16
Member

ABDUL GAFOOR CP
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 30
Rep Power: 5
Quote:
 Originally Posted by ringtail FYI http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/wind/val.../spatconv.html In my opinion, grid independence is almost impractical, especially for engineering
thanks sir.......for your valuable suggestion.....and can you suggest me that if am getting same solution in a range of 60000 cells(maximum number of cells are only 1.2 lakh)...can I go further with my solution with this grid setup...pls reply...

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Khan FLUENT 10 July 2, 2015 22:40 lucifer FLUENT 0 December 14, 2009 20:59 littlelz CFX 4 March 30, 2009 07:16 Art Stretton Phoenics 5 April 2, 2002 05:59 G.Balakrishnan FLUENT 4 November 21, 2000 12:05