|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
how we will feel that solution is correct if we dont have experimental results : on the basis of convergence or any any thing else
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Convergence is only one of the criteria, but not the only one. You should also consider the validity of the model, the quality of the numerical solution (order of the discretization scheme, grid quality, ...), the precision in the boundary conditions settings...
So there is no sure answer to your question, in my opinion. I think it's always worth to compare the results of the calculations with experimental data. If they're not available, try to look for similar cases in the literature for example. Hi ![]() ap |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
grid dependancy | gueynard a. | Main CFD Forum | 19 | June 27, 2014 21:22 |
Could anybody help me see this error and give help | liugx212 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | January 4, 2006 18:07 |
loading new mesh in converged solution | Claudia | FLUENT | 1 | November 4, 2005 05:23 |
Has the pressure correction method problems? | X. Ye | Main CFD Forum | 17 | September 1, 1999 16:14 |
Wall functions | Abhijit Tilak | Main CFD Forum | 6 | February 5, 1999 01:16 |