|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I am modeling a structure in open air. Fluent works fine when I use a pressure inlet/pressure outlet boundary condition but the code breaks down when I have a velocity inlet/pressure outlet boundary condition. I was wondering if the latter boundary conditions were inappropriate for modeling open air conditions. I will be glad to have a response. Thanks.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Some boundary condition sets allow for more stable convergence, but are not necessarily the best choice of b.c.'s. If you are unsatisfied with your results or choice of b.c.'s, examine other parts of your set up, like the mesh, ur factors, etc.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
can you give us details on your problem? What is your explanation for using pout and pin? and then why vel inlet and p out?
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Open Channel Flow Boundary Conditions | TWaung | STAR-CCM+ | 2 | October 7, 2011 01:37 |
problem is modeling and simulation of an air foil | alnabhani | CFX | 4 | December 2, 2010 14:24 |
Open Channel Flow Boundary Conditions. | rahulrp | FLUENT | 0 | December 1, 2010 08:32 |
DxFoam reader update | hjasak | OpenFOAM Post-Processing | 69 | April 24, 2008 02:24 |
dpm spray into open air | kev | FLUENT | 1 | December 3, 2005 03:52 |