|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
which one of turbulence models perform better prediction for Hull resistance and how can I compute the inlet values to avoid trubulent viscosity reaches its' maximum ,1E5?
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Realizable k-epsilon or SST k-omega model would give reasonable prediction of viscous (frictional+ form) resistance. Reynolds-stress transport model is probably the best choice for resistance and wake prediction. You can find a fairly comprehensive study on turblent flow around a ship hulll based on FLUENT in:
KIm and Rhee, 2002, "Assessment of Eight Turbulence Models for a 3-D Boundary layer involving Crossflow and Streamwise Vortices", AIAA Papaer 2002-0852. |
|
|
||
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I utilize Reynolds-stress transport model (RSM) to get a bad result in predicting skin friction resistance of a straight pipe.Enhanced wall treatment, y+=1-2.
K-e model is better than RSM in predicting skin friction coefficient of a straight pipe. I don't konw why it is. |
|
|
||
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
hi i heard from some prof. that k-e is not for external flows!!! but it is simple to get solution. no I am trying RSM but results are quite similar (sic!)
|
|
|
||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Ship resistance | tobino | FLUENT | 0 | June 27, 2011 21:31 |
| hull resistance | Mirco | CFX | 0 | April 6, 2007 12:05 |
| Analysis of ship hull resistance and properties | AL | Main CFD Forum | 0 | July 10, 2006 16:34 |
| hull resistance need help | hakan ozdemir | FLUENT | 3 | March 23, 2006 04:37 |
| Hull Resistance | yavuz hakan ozdemir | FLUENT | 2 | March 16, 2006 05:13 |