CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Is Fluent valid for low Re condition?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   January 13, 2005, 03:26
Default Is Fluent valid for low Re condition?
  #1
REACTION
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I hear from someone that fluent results are quite bad for low Re fluid. Is it true?

Thanks for all replies!
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 13, 2005, 03:28
Default Re: Is Fluent valid for low Re condition?
  #2
Sundar
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Not really !
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 13, 2005, 04:04
Default Re: Is Fluent valid for low Re condition?
  #3
REACTION
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
So how is the deviation of the fluent results? Thanks, Sundar
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 13, 2005, 04:07
Default Re: Is Fluent valid for low Re condition?
  #4
Sundar
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hey, Are you looking at turbulent flows ? Let me know. Would you like meet me at hotmail msn ? Sundar
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 17, 2005, 08:00
Default Re: Is Fluent valid for low Re condition?
  #5
REACTION
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Not turbulent. The laminar flow is not accurate with big deviation.
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 20, 2005, 22:37
Default Re: Is Fluent valid for low Re condition?
  #6
swarup
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Fluent is very well applicable for low Re flows. are you using very small dimensions in geometry say 40 micron or so? if so, and if you are treating a gas flow (check even if liquid flow is treated), then you should check whether Knudsen number is greater than 0.01. if so, continuum assumption may break down and deviations may be observed.
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 5, 2005, 02:25
Default Re: Is Fluent valid for low Re condition?
  #7
REACTION
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
How to check Knudsen Number? Yes, you are right. My computational domain is around 40*40*40 micron. It is just a simple water flow past a sphere with radius 1 micron. But I think for such a dimension the N-S equation should be applicable.
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 5, 2005, 02:28
Default Re: Is Fluent valid for low Re condition?
  #8
REACTION
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Has somebody used fluent to simulate flow in channel with the dimension of tens microns?

Thanks for reply!
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 5, 2005, 23:52
Default Re: Is Fluent valid for low Re condition?
  #9
swarup
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi i am simulating a microchannel with liquid phase reaction in single phase. However, my channel is not 10 micron width/dia. actually, continuum assumption holds for Knudesen number less than 0.01 and Knudesen number depends upon characteristic channel dimension and mean free path or an equivalent measure of intercollision distance between molecules. thus, Kn=lambda/characteristic dimension(e.g. width or dia of channel). if my guess is right, 10 micron may be too a small dimension for gas flow but may work for liquids depending upon Kn. in Nguyen's book "Fundamentals and Applications of Microfluidics", a chart explaining Kn and continuum assumption applicability is given. you may consult that. regards, swarup.
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 6, 2005, 00:03
Default Re: Is Fluent valid for low Re condition?
  #10
swarup
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi, The Knudsen number is Kn=(intercollision distance or mean free path of molecules)/(characteristic channel dimension). i guess the particle is confined in a channel/cavity. you may choose the characteristic dimension according to your flow geometry. validity of NSE will depend upon Kn. regards swarup.
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 6, 2005, 06:40
Default Re: Is Fluent valid for low Re condition?
  #11
REACTION
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thanks, swarup. I have checked the mean free path of water fluid is about 3x1e-10m, and the Knudesen number is quite smaller than 0.01. I have given you an email, we can disscuss this problem.
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Assistance for modelling unsteady supersonic flow in FLUENT SATISH A.V FLUENT 11 October 1, 2014 22:36
Viscoelastic flow modeling in Fluent Ankur Navra FLUENT 3 July 26, 2013 05:56
Airfoil boundary condition Frank Main CFD Forum 1 April 21, 2008 18:36
Periodic flow boundary condition problem sudha FLUENT 3 April 28, 2004 08:40
External,incompressible flow boundary condition? John Main CFD Forum 0 October 1, 2003 00:00


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:51.