CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > FLUENT

Modelling combustion (3D VS 2D)

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   February 8, 2005, 04:40
Default Modelling combustion (3D VS 2D)
Posts: n/a

I've already sent a mail about a trouble to model a propergol combustion in a chamber.

I mean I modeled this case with a pressure inlet BC. First, I had a mesh which gave me a straight temperature evolution along the revolution axis of the pressure inlet BC section.

Then, I tried to model in a 2D case with a 2d axisymetric case. I reached the same results (no really decreasing of temperature gases along the axis (the pressure inlet BC section is 0.050 m diameter, and I do not have temperature decreasing 20 m away from the inlet BC !.

But I was not satisfied of this results, that is why I modeled a new 3D case with a better size function, and here I got a decrease at 2,50 m from the inlet.

I do believe the last modelling results are better, but someone could give me his feeling about this...(realistic phenomenum, not able to reproduce a 2D case...)

Many thanks

  Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Combustion modelling in OpenFOAM - Difficulties AleDR OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 22 October 12, 2016 03:12
Modelling Combustion in Porous Zone tanjinjack FLUENT 2 September 26, 2016 04:10
Combustion modelling results accuracies Les Main CFD Forum 7 June 1, 2011 08:55
Combustion modelling with energy source Marc_L FLUENT 0 July 13, 2010 07:58
Combustion Modelling Ridwan FLUENT 1 June 27, 2005 09:43

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:54.