# On the time step size.

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 March 31, 2005, 21:49 On the time step size. #1 mini Guest   Posts: n/a Hello everyone: During the unsteady computation, can the increased time step size affect the results and postprocessing? If I set the time step size 1e-05 initially and 1e-04 finally , are the results reasonable?

 April 1, 2005, 02:35 Re: On the time step size. #2 debs Guest   Posts: n/a What is your numerical Scheme ? If the scheme is implicit the difference should not be so much . In an explicit scheme the difference can be considerable even for simple problems.

 April 1, 2005, 07:42 Re: On the time step size. #3 ap Guest   Posts: n/a Right. Also consider the physical time scale of the system you're modeling. You should use a time step smaller than it. Best regards, ap

 April 3, 2005, 06:46 Re: On the time step size. #4 khalid sultan Guest   Posts: n/a Hi mini; The time step - according to my knowledge - is dependent on: 1- the cell length. 2- the {|u+a|} term which express the maximum speed with which the information can travel. 3-and the CFL. If the cell has del(x) != del(y), you can take the smaller to compute the time step, although there are some other tricks that could be used. Having this said, the time step should be calculated and not given. Of course if you give a little bit smaller time step than that computed, your solver will work. this is equvalent to decreasing the CFL, but you will increase; meanninglessly, your executaion time. The same arguement apply -to some extent- for a little bit increase. Hoping it will help. cheers ;-)

 April 3, 2005, 09:27 Re: On the time step size. #5 ap Guest   Posts: n/a This is true if you use an explicit method, while if you use a fully implicit one, the method is stable for each value of the time step. However, this doesn't mean you can use a time step as big as you like. Obviously you still have the physical constraints on your dt to obtain an accurate solution. ap

 April 3, 2005, 20:29 Re: On the time step size. #6 mini Guest   Posts: n/a implicit scheme, thanks.

 April 3, 2005, 20:32 Re: On the time step size. #7 mini Guest   Posts: n/a Yes. Thanks.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Fabio88 OpenFOAM Installation 21 June 2, 2010 03:01 m9819348 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 7 October 27, 2007 00:36 skabilan OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 12 September 17, 2007 17:48 co2 FLUENT 7 June 3, 2004 21:56 co2 FLUENT 6 May 17, 2004 07:25

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:16.