CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > FLUENT

planing craft

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   April 5, 2005, 03:48
Default planing craft
Posts: n/a
hi i am modelling only the under water portion of planing craft. we are using sinkage and trim values obtained from experiments. at low speed fluent is giving drag comparable with experiments. but at high speeds(5m/s) the drag values are 5 times the experimental.

what should i do to get the correct drag.

i have tried using all the turbulence models and differnt domain and also using different mesh sizes.

expecting your reply soon

thanking u

  Reply With Quote

Old   April 5, 2005, 07:10
Default Re: planing craft
Posts: n/a
Are you looking at actual drag, or at the drag coefficient? If you're looking at the drag coefficient, then check your reference values (Report->Reference Values).

If you're looking at the actual drag, then your solution is probably wrong. Check the pressure gradients, especially near the stagnation point. Look at the pressure coefficient as well and see if it makes sense (shouldn't be above 1 at these speeds). Look for problems in the solution that could point out problems in the mesh.

Hope this helps, and goodluck, Jason
  Reply With Quote

Old   April 5, 2005, 09:11
Default Re: ship resistance
Posts: n/a
thanks to jason for his reply. i am getting the right drag value for displacement(trim angle=0) ship. But for planing craft(at some trim angle) i am not getting the correct drag. it is highly overpredicting. i am only modelling the under water portion. why the code is behaving like this.

expecting your reply
  Reply With Quote

Old   April 11, 2005, 21:57
Default lift coefn. value.
Posts: n/a
hi, i am modelling a stretched hemisphere in a wind tunnel. BC is from the experiment value where the speed is varies from 8m/s to 20 m/s.I get comparable value of drag coefficient but 100 times small value for lift coefn. (0.0004, -0.0003) and unconsistent.

What should i do? i have try using different turbulance model size of meshing and also have check the references values.

expecting your answer ASAP. TQ..


  Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fluent & Ship Motion planing craft colaktu FLUENT 0 June 28, 2011 02:45
planing craft sulfi FLUENT 0 April 5, 2005 03:46
planing craft phil FLUENT 0 May 10, 2004 08:38
Planing water craft Adam Steinitz Main CFD Forum 5 December 23, 2000 17:01
CFD codes for Planing Craft Richard Pemberton Main CFD Forum 0 January 14, 1999 15:02

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:12.