CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > FLUENT

Is there something more suitable than GAMBIT?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   May 17, 2005, 04:59
Default Is there something more suitable than GAMBIT?
Posts: n/a
Hi Users,

I have been given a project to model fluid flow through a porous rock core. The core sample contains a complex geometry of organic curves and is in ASCII format.

What kind of pre-processor could you recommend for constructing this geometry?

Thanks in advance,

  Reply With Quote

Old   May 18, 2005, 05:02
Default Re: Is there something more suitable than GAMBIT?
Posts: n/a
Autocad might be a good option

  Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Constant velocity of the material Sas CFX 15 July 13, 2010 08:56
Gambit 2.3.16, Xming or Exceed...HELP! bambam3417 FLUENT 10 May 7, 2010 12:39
mass flow in is not equal to mass flow out saii CFX 2 September 18, 2009 08:07
Gambit -dev X11 doesn't work Ervin Amet FLUENT 0 October 28, 2007 09:33
Gambit boundary conditions not suitable for fluent ann FLUENT 3 October 12, 2005 12:51

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:33.