|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I'm running a case of bouyancy driven flow in a box-test geometry; I've got an upper "pressure outlet" surface and a lower "pressure inlet" surface. Lateral surface are "symmetry" type but in the middle, on one hand, there's a "wall" type surface at 293.15 K. I'm running with only air as compressible ideal gas. The bulk temperature, as the inlet and outlet temperature, is fixed at 373.15K. Operating pressure is 2 bar. Viscosity model is RNG K-e. Is it necessary to use an Enanched Wall Treatment option to take into account correctly the effect of buoyancy near the cooled wall or it's possible to use Standard Wall Function?
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
You can use standard wall functions provided you check your y+ values.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
is there any parallel code for the famous Lid Driven Cavity flow? | gholamghar | Main CFD Forum | 0 | August 1, 2010 01:55 |
Buoyancy Driven Flow - HELP! | Carlos | FLUENT | 2 | October 11, 2007 02:35 |
Can 'shock waves' occur in viscous fluid flows? | diaw | Main CFD Forum | 104 | February 16, 2006 05:44 |
bouyancy driven flow | adrienne | CFX | 5 | January 6, 2003 08:55 |
Inviscid Drag at subsonic, subcritical Mach # | Axel Rohde | Main CFD Forum | 1 | November 19, 2001 12:19 |