|
[Sponsors] |
August 2, 2005, 06:58 |
BLUFF BODY+ RSM
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I'm studing a bluff body subject to wind. I applied Spalart Allmaras and K-epsilon realizable, but I got different results. So I was thinking to compare them with RSM model. I'm doubtful about the values of the constants assigned by default by Fluent. Are the constants appropriate in the case of an incompressible fluid? Thanks in advance! Anto
|
|
August 2, 2005, 16:16 |
Re: BLUFF BODY+ RSM
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I have done similar simulations but subject to water. In my experience, RSM model produces more accurate results and the default constants seem to be appropriate (I am assuming you calculate the values of k and epsilon though). However, the K-epsilon model is more dissipative. So this may cast shadows over the default values.
|
|
August 3, 2005, 06:09 |
Re: BLUFF BODY+ RSM
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks! I have calculated the intensity of turbulence and the lenght instead of k and epsilon. I set a ddp steady case with RSM with the 1st order accuracy at the beginning and after, to second order, but the cd is diverging. Any suggestions? Thanks again! Anto
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bluff body used for diffuser testing | lemat1 | Siemens | 0 | December 5, 2009 10:11 |
temperature going negative behind a bluff body | Sourabh | Phoenics | 6 | December 1, 2007 19:50 |
Bluff Body | krithiga | Siemens | 4 | November 7, 2006 16:45 |
UDF for lift force on a bluff body | sawa | FLUENT | 2 | April 11, 2005 04:06 |
triangular bluff body | Pratap | Main CFD Forum | 0 | April 5, 2004 03:23 |