|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I have to model combustion in industrial furnace and I decided to model a section of the furnace (2d problem). When I set the boundary condition for air inlet I can't decide if I have to choose "velocity inlet" or "mass flow inlet". In the first case, my 2d simulation doesn't respect the mass balance of the real furnace; in the second case my 2d simulation doesn't respect the effective flow velocity in the furnace. What I have to do? Is it a limitation of 2d simulation in comparison with 3d simulation? I hope my question were clear… thanks
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
A two-dimensional analysis assumed a unit depth, so the velocity inlet does respect the mass balance. To use a mass flow inlet, you need to reduce the mass flow accordingly. For example, if you have 100 kg/s entering a 10 m deep furnace and your 2-D model is built in meters, you need to enter 10 kg/s.
|
|
|
||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| CO2 condensor mass flow rate BC at inlet and oulet possible? | Boo85 | CFX | 0 | August 17, 2011 23:20 |
| Mass flow inlet | Anshul | FLUENT | 2 | March 4, 2005 01:19 |
| mass flow + pressure inlet??? | whai | FLUENT | 2 | June 24, 2003 14:42 |
| Mass flow inlet B.C. at exit... | Jack Keays | FLUENT | 2 | October 6, 2000 09:39 |
| fluid flow fundas | ram | Main CFD Forum | 5 | June 17, 2000 22:31 |