 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
[Sponsors] | ||||
October 28, 2005, 06:11
|
gambit meshing scheme question
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
hi hi
want to ask also the spacing size when we mesh the face does not matter as long as we graded the edges right. It will be ignored right? thanks a lot again, Juliana Pesma |
|
|
||
|
October 28, 2005, 10:15
|
Re: gambit meshing scheme question
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
It shouldn't matter for a mapped or submapped scheme. It will matter for a pave scheme (either quad-pave, or tet-pave).
Hope this helps, and good luck, Jason |
|
|
|
||
 |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Gambit 2.0 and 2.2 STAIRSTEP meshing difference | Paweł | FLUENT | 0 | October 15, 2006 11:34 |
| IMPRINT COMMAND IN COOPER MESHING SCHEME | TINA | FLUENT | 3 | October 7, 2006 06:03 |
| Gambit question | Sean Cody | FLUENT | 1 | April 3, 2006 01:40 |
| Meshing Aircraft with Gambit | Ed | FLUENT | 5 | November 9, 2004 06:04 |
| Question about meshing / solution scheme of CFX | Coriolius | CFX | 8 | August 1, 2004 19:39 |
Linear Mode
