|
[Sponsors] |
November 28, 2005, 05:30 |
Parallel processing + DO model
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi everybody,
Quick question: Does fluent allow parallel processing in a DO radiation model ? Thanks |
|
November 28, 2005, 06:57 |
Re: Parallel processing + DO model
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
yes we can do "do radiation model" in parallel
|
|
November 29, 2005, 04:03 |
Re: Parallel processing + DO model
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Generally yes, but in this moment I have a problem to run one case with DO in parallel:
iter continuity x-velocity y-velocity z-velocity energy k epsilon do-intensi ch4 o2 co2 co h2o pollut_no pollut_n2o time/iter 7022 1.0064e-05 1.7265e-07 8.1095e-08 9.0340e-08 7.2940e-08 1.9221e-07 5.3088e-07 2.3053e-07 2.2828e-06 8.2251e-08 8.0077e-08 6.3796e-07 1.0677e-07 1.7240e-07 5.1015e-06 0:00:00 1 ================================================== ============================ Stack backtrace generated for node id 1 on signal 11 : Please include this information with any bug report you file on this issue! ================================================== ============================ /usr/cfd/Fluent.Inc/fluent6.2.16/lnx86/3d_node/fluent_smpi.6.2.16[0x874bcfa] /usr/cfd/Fluent.Inc/fluent6.2.16/lnx86/3d_node/fluent_smpi.6.2.16[0x874bfe7] [0xffffe420] /usr/cfd/Fluent.Inc/fluent6.2.16/lnx86/3d_node/fluent_smpi.6.2.16(Scalar_Reconstruction+0x166)[0x827cb16] /usr/cfd/Fluent.Inc/fluent6.2.16/lnx86/3d_node/fluent_smpi.6.2.16(Solve_Disco+0x89f)[0x838553f] /usr/cfd/Fluent.Inc/fluent6.2.16/lnx86/3d_node/fluent_smpi.6.2.16[0x8391067] /usr/cfd/Fluent.Inc/fluent6.2.16/lnx86/3d_node/fluent_smpi.6.2.16(Models_Send_update_solve+0x13e)[0x81cbcbe] /usr/cfd/Fluent.Inc/fluent6.2.16/lnx86/3d_node/fluent_smpi.6.2.16(Flow_Iterate+0x658)[0x8146778] /usr/cfd/Fluent.Inc/fluent6.2.16/lnx86/3d_node/fluent_smpi.6.2.16[0x81b6173] /usr/cfd/Fluent.Inc/fluent6.2.16/lnx86/3d_node/fluent_smpi.6.2.16(eval+0xb6f)[0x875dc46] /usr/cfd/Fluent.Inc/fluent6.2.16/lnx86/3d_node/fluent_smpi.6.2.16(PRF_Command_Start+0x1008)[0x81b5748] /usr/cfd/Fluent.Inc/fluent6.2.16/lnx86/3d_node/fluent_smpi.6.2.16(PRF_Node_repl+0x22)[0x81b8622] /usr/cfd/Fluent.Inc/fluent6.2.16/lnx86/3d_node/fluent_smpi.6.2.16(main+0xde)[0x8628f8e] /lib/i686/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xb2)[0x40053972] /usr/cfd/Fluent.Inc/fluent6.2.16/lnx86/3d_node/fluent_smpi.6.2.16(dlopen+0x45)[0x8094941] alias cfd='cd /usr/cfd' alias d='ls -latr' alias cfd='cd /usr/cfd' alias d='ls -latr' Primitive Error at Node 1: received Segmentation Violation alias cfd='cd /usr/cfd' alias d='ls -latr' Error: Compute node encountered error |
|
November 29, 2005, 04:18 |
Re: Parallel processing + DO model
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
It requirs more memory in parallel also. So best way to use is "Solve radiation for every 2/4 flow iterations." Check for this option in radiation panel.
|
|
November 29, 2005, 14:06 |
Re: Parallel processing + DO model
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Iterations without DO equations solving works without problem. Iteration with DO equations solving gives me the error. And, probably I have enough memory... I have discussed the problem with Fluent user support without success...
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NO model vs post processing in coal combustion,CFX | sakalido | CFX | 1 | April 15, 2011 14:07 |
DPM model in parallel batch mode | Prashanth | FLUENT | 2 | March 6, 2009 07:54 |
Parallel processing in quad core | Renato Pacheco | FLUENT | 1 | June 4, 2008 12:06 |
bubbly flow and parallel processing | mvee | FLUENT | 0 | September 12, 2007 05:08 |
parallel processing | Nurul Murad | FLUENT | 2 | July 25, 2001 03:11 |