# Heat transfer coefficient artificially high in BL

 User Name Remember Me Password
 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 December 12, 2005, 12:26 Heat transfer coefficient artificially high in BL #1 mat w Guest   Posts: n/a I've come against a problem that I can't figure out, hopefully someone here may be able to help- I'm modelling a cylinder in crossflow. The cylinder is in a rectangular channel and is attached to the channel walls at the base and top of the cylinder. The cylinder is heated from one end using a constant temperature condition. There inlet and outlet are set to pressure inlet and outlet boundary conditions. The problem is that on the surface of the cylinder on the cell adjacent to the heated surface, the heat transfer coefficient is much higher than it should be. (y+ is in the log layer).The problem is localised to this cell only, and the heat transfer coefficient on the rest of the cylinder seems reasonable. Any ideas why this happens and how I can prevent this from happening? I've tried reducing and increasing the grid, but to no avail. Any comments would be much appreciated.

 December 28, 2005, 14:32 Re: Heat transfer coefficient artificially high in #2 Tighe Guest   Posts: n/a Mat W, If your turbulence model is incorrect the wrong heat transfer coefficeient will be calcualted. You might trying running the problem as laminar flow and see if it makes a difference in the coefficent. I have run into this problem with cylinders in crossflow before and have conqured them to within 10% or so. Give me a better idea of the range of Re and Pr you are running in and I can give you better insight. Tighe Smith Principle R&D Engineer Delta M Corp

 December 28, 2005, 19:27 Re: Heat transfer coefficient artificially high in #3 mat w Guest   Posts: n/a Tighe, Thanks for taking an interest- here is some more info on the case. The Re (based on cylinder diameter) is 600 and the fluid is air at around ambient temperature so the Pr is about 0.7. I've since altered my model - instead of applying heat directly to the base of the cylinder and the prime surface, I have modelled the cylinder on a solid. The heat enters the model via the base of this solid and enters the base of the cylinder by conduction. In addition, I have reduced the boundary layer grid further and turned on the enhanced wall function. The good news is that the excessively high heat transfer coefficients have since disappeared. The bad news is that I suspect I will have to embark on an unsteady investigation to fully determine the behaviour of the model. Please do pass on any info you have on any of the problems I encountered, I'd still like to run models with smaller grids to give me a rough idea of performance before establishing grid independance on specific cases that show promise.

 Thread Tools Search this Thread Search this Thread: Advanced Search Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are Off Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Alberto Schroth FLUENT 17 February 10, 2020 08:40 John CFX 3 April 4, 2012 17:50 mehrdadeng CFX 10 February 25, 2011 05:25 los OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 5 January 31, 2010 17:44 ravi FLUENT 0 July 23, 2004 00:08

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:12.

 Contact Us - CFD Online - Privacy Statement - Top