|
[Sponsors] |
why static parameters are considered more imp. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
December 14, 2005, 08:02 |
why static parameters are considered more imp.
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
why static parameters are considered more imp. Most of the example i have seen is they give static parameter (like static pressure,static temperature,etc.) at the boundary condition. If any one knew about this, they are most welcome to share there views.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
error: uninitialized local variable 't' used | MASOUD | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 5 | October 17, 2016 04:24 |
UDF issue | MASOUD | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 14 | December 6, 2012 13:39 |
fprint problem | MASOUD | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 5 | October 30, 2011 16:08 |
defining a term for a domain using DEFINE_ADJUST | MASOUD | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 1 | September 24, 2010 05:08 |
enum | MASOUD | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 0 | June 5, 2010 00:49 |