why static parameters are considered more imp. -- CFD Online Discussion Forums

December 14, 2005, 08:02	why static parameters are considered more imp.	#1
sangam Guest Posts: n/a	why static parameters are considered more imp. Most of the example i have seen is they give static parameter (like static pressure,static temperature,etc.) at the boundary condition. If any one knew about this, they are most welcome to share there views.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Trackbacks are Off Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
error: uninitialized local variable 't' used	MASOUD	Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming	5	October 17, 2016 04:24
UDF issue	MASOUD	Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming	14	December 6, 2012 13:39
fprint problem	MASOUD	Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming	5	October 30, 2011 16:08
defining a term for a domain using DEFINE_ADJUST	MASOUD	Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming	1	September 24, 2010 05:08
enum	MASOUD	Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming	0	June 5, 2010 00:49

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:27.